Verne Bunsen
Hero Member
- Messages
- 2,472
No logical discussion of a moral dilemma would be complete without a little Spock :icon_biggrin:
Another relevant Ben Franklin-ism is: “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Granted he could not have envisioned a global society connected in the ways that we are, but it is a thought provoking sentiment. Even assuming that every decision made by those in power during this scenario has been genuinely made in the best interest of the population, once the precedent is established and the public are conditioned to accept it, what are the chances that a convenient crisis will be available whenever a little extra control is desired? “Martial Law” results in pitchforks and torches; “Shelter In Place” results in unquestioning obedience and self-policing within communities. Don’t think our benevolent overlords aren’t taking notes.
Another relevant Ben Franklin-ism is: “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Granted he could not have envisioned a global society connected in the ways that we are, but it is a thought provoking sentiment. Even assuming that every decision made by those in power during this scenario has been genuinely made in the best interest of the population, once the precedent is established and the public are conditioned to accept it, what are the chances that a convenient crisis will be available whenever a little extra control is desired? “Martial Law” results in pitchforks and torches; “Shelter In Place” results in unquestioning obedience and self-policing within communities. Don’t think our benevolent overlords aren’t taking notes.