Verne Bunsen
Hero Member
- Messages
- 2,472
Good advice, and duly noted!
Cagey said:Yeah, they surprised the hell out of me. When the first one broke, I was like WTF? I'd never had such a thing happen before. Forewarned, I still broke a second one, and I'm not one prone to muscle that sort of thing. I mean, I've only installed about eleventy bajillion pots over the last 50 years or so. In retrospect, I realized that probably most, if not all of them had larger brass bushings.
Bagman67 said:Hey, VB, I'll look in my Drawer of Misfit Parts and see if I've got an odd fine-knurled flat-top Tele knob lying around. Will follow up in this thread later tonight or tomorrow.
Logrinn said:That looks mighty fine! Good work with that wiring.
Rgand said:Looking good! I do like that pot/switch.
It sounds like a fine thing to try. Let's see, that means another build to plan after the ones I have on the drawing board now. :icon_biggrin:-VB- said:Rgand said:Looking good! I do like that pot/switch.
Thanks! I’m pretty thoroughly impressed with the S1 switch. I expected it to be a pain to wire up, but it was really quite painless. I’d go so far as to say it is easier to deal with than your standard DPDT push/pulls, and it has twice the switching power. With so many wires in so small a space, I can see where you could make a headache for yourself by getting in your own way, but with a little foresight and planning it is not so bad. The only drawback I can see at this point is that you are severely limited in regards to knob selection. I’m interested to see how it holds up, although with Fender installing them as OEM components I expect they should be good for a whole lot of cycles.
Rgand said:What taper is the pot on it?
Cagey said:Very nice work! Neatly done, so I'm sure it'll drop right in. Famous last words, I know, but you were clearly diligent about neatness, solid connections, and mechanical support, which are areas many wiring jobs suffer from.
However, between those pickups and the lack of shielded cabling, I suspect it may be more noise-prone than I'd be able to tolerate. Although, admittedly, my tolerance for such things is ridiculously low. You could shield the cavities in the body, but I wouldn't expect too much out of that. Won't hurt anything, but won't return a great deal, either. If it was me, I'd take a good look and perhaps do a test if possible with EHX's little "Hum Debugger" magic box...
[youtube]VbdtS_SNqvY[/youtube]
It's not a noise gate, so there's no "gating" effect to it. That is, you don't hear it turning on/off like you do with gates. I think it's basically what's called a "3rd order Butterworth filter" that's tuned to some very narrow frequencies, so the only thing it kills is 50/60hz and maybe some first or second order harmonics. So, it has very little effect on the tone of the instrument, but is highly effective at noise filtering.
They're relatively inexpensive and highly effective. Why we don't hear more about them is a bit of a mystery to me, but maybe it's as I said earlier - it's just me and my low noise tolerance. Or, perhaps people just don't want to spend money on a widget that isn't a "special effect" and doesn't make them sound like SRV or Jeff Beck RFN. Anyway, I've heard the thing work in real life, and can't imagine going without one if I played a noisy guitar.
Thanks.-VB- said:Rgand said:What taper is the pot on it?
It’s an audio taper.
BigSteve22 said:Plus 1 on the EHx "Hum Debugger". Does what it advertises, without destroying your tone. No clamping, so sustain remains. Just remember that it's not designed to attenuate noise generated by other pedals, so it will not replace a gate. It's strictly to kill EMI induced hum. It's the first pedal on my board, with a Boss NS-2 at the other end, for those times when only a gate will do.