sixstringsamurai
Hero Member
- Messages
- 702
Deal.Wyliee said:McGuyver and Sixstringsamurai: behave and be nice or go to your rooms.
I am outta here.
Deal.Wyliee said:McGuyver and Sixstringsamurai: behave and be nice or go to your rooms.
sixstringsamurai said:Deal.Wyliee said:McGuyver and Sixstringsamurai: behave and be nice or go to your rooms.
I am outta here.
McGuyver said:Thank you Cagey, for actual information. This is what I was looking for. As for my hero, I'd be willing to bet that old habits die hard, which is probably why there are luthiers who have been playing for over 50 years that still wind strings with locking tuners. Which is more-so why I asked, I suppose you think those guys are all stupid also? Clearly I came onto these forums with doe-eyed ignorance.
Altar said:Maybe someone older and wiser than myself can get through to you...
But honestly, he is not trolling.. Even if that comment was meant to offend you, you are taking it way too far and making it into a big deal.
Just. F*cking. Stop.
Cagey said:I'm sorry; I shouldn't have called the guy "stupid" - I don't know any better. Guy's probably smarter than me and it's probably as you say - force of habit. I know I've got a niece who didn't like the lockers on her guitar for a long time until somebody pointed out that she was using them wrong. All those wraps of string act like a spring, and every time you stretch a string or detune it, they wind/unwind then wind up in a different place due to the friction between the post and the string.
The extreme case and the first practical acknowledgement of the problem showed up when Floyd Rose came up with his locking nut to pair up with his locking bridge (there were no such things as locking tuners back then). Clamping the string right at the nut eliminated a great deal of the tuning issues a vibrato bridge exacerbates.
sixstringsamurai said:See this is one of those grey areas where everyone will tell you something A lil different.
Half to 3/4 of a turn is MORE than sufficient.