Read the post again, and the quote that it references young Padawan...
View attachment 63497
Imperial tools are needed for imperial parts and metric tools for metric parts.
yes,
@stratamania
i know enough to use metric for metric and standard/imperial for standard/inches.
but the answer to the question still hasn't been given. it's an easy question. but nobody just answers it. they makes a sarcastic comment and then move on.
Here is the question.........again. you can take it hypothetically if you want....
If you were going to buy the Stewmac string action gauge, would you buy it in metric or standard/imperial?
i do like the under-the-strings radius tools that is imperial (i always thought that this was refereed to as "standard"...where did this "imperial" designation come from..............well "imperial" as in English Kings and Monarch's rules/laws/etc ) as a former auto-mechanic and auto-body man we just called things "standard" or "metric"
and the other part of the question? are some or all of stewmac's tool line "over-rated" or over-priced?
i'm thinking that Stewmac is probably similar to Snap-on tools........top dog. worth every penny if you are using them to make a living. if not, then craftsman will get the job done, but the snap-ons still feel soooo much better in your hands!
so if stewmac = snap-on,
does music-nomad = craftsman? or is there a 3rd company for good guitar tools? i've only come across stewmac and music-nomad so far.
part of my metric/standard questions run more in depth than just doing basic tune ups. i'm going to be purchasing tools to do complete fret-jobs. i imagine that stewmac's fret job tools are probably the best way to go as far a quality is concerned, so are measurements for a fret-job going to be more standard or more metric? or a combination of both, in which i'd have to buy each tool separately if that tool comes in either/or.