Did this on the 1st one and slightly tapered down to low E on the others. E and B are fairly in the same spot on all of mine.DMRACO said:just curious when placing a bridge on a 24.75 scale neck, or any other neck for that matter. When using a strat style bridge, what process does everyone use?
I usually set all the saddles in the middle of their adjustment range, measure the scale from the nut and place the bridge appropriately with the saddles on that measurement.
I figure the high E will have to be moved a bit closer to the nut while the low E will be moved towards the bridge. What is everyone else doing for builds that don't have the bridge holes pre-drilled??
For any 6 saddle bridge I start with:DMRACO said:just curious when placing a bridge on a 24.75 scale neck, or any other neck for that matter. When using a strat style bridge, what process does everyone use?
I usually set all the saddles in the middle of their adjustment range, measure the scale from the nut and place the bridge appropriately with the saddles on that measurement.
I figure the high E will have to be moved a bit closer to the nut while the low E will be moved towards the bridge. What is everyone else doing for builds that don't have the bridge holes pre-drilled??
I've seen recommendations somewhere that the high side should be 0 - 1/8" further back, and the low side 1/8 - 1/4" further back than the theoretical scale lengthDMRACO said:just curious when placing a bridge on a 24.75 scale neck, or any other neck for that matter. When using a strat style bridge, what process does everyone use?
NoAm I reading this right?
Angling a hardtail bridge to get proper intonation without string, screw, saddle interference sounds pretty extreme. Aren't the Fender hardtails all string through not top loader so is it even possible without major mods?
Yeah my question was because of this statement...
"I'll probably leave the high E side bridge plate attachment screw in place and move the low E bridge plate side back approximately 1/8" to achieve proper intonation adjustments according to my measurements"
I did not go the angled route however I moved the bridge back and obtained the results I wanted...lots of work. And besides it would have been a never ending line of people telling me my bridge was crooked. I updated post with details. Thanks to all for the replies.I've never tried a conversion neck (maybe next screamin' deals blowout? lol) but this sounds like something the good folks at Warmoth would assist with.
Am I reading this right? Angling a hardtail bridge to get proper intonation without string, screw, saddle interference sounds pretty extreme. Aren't the Fender hardtails all string through not top loader so is it even possible without major mods?
For what its worth not specific to conversion necks but shorter scale in general. I think the need for drastic intonation adjustments on shorter scale guitars is exaggerated. I have a Jaguar style 24" scale setup very similar to my 25.5" scale guitars minimal relief action hovering around 4/64" at 15th fret all with the same 10-46's. The 24" scale needs at most 1/64" more string length correction on some strings versus the 25.5".
I think the Gibson horror stories come from periods where they located bridges badly. That in combination with still to this day they use inconsistent non-modern non-standard methods for calculating fret placement. It confuses people as to what the scale length really is - which is almost never true 24.75".