Cagey said:
I doubt it affects tonal character enough to be a worthwhile endeavor. I think Fernando had it right - Leo was notoriously frugal. If he did it, it was almost certainly to save money. You'll notice nobody else did/does it, and there are a lotta builders who give serious consideration to the tonal performance of their build materials/construction techniques, even when it doesn't make a difference.
I'm not claiming Leo did this construction technique for tonal reasons. I would assume it's because, as stated, its for price cutting measures. Business is business. Nonetheless, regardless of Leo's reasons, an effect, though unexpected and unintentional, can occur... An effect can include a tonal change.
And I'm in the camp that tone woods do matter. IDK how much a fretboard would contribute to the tone but if I could spend 5 minutes and somewhere between $0-$35 to most likely get more neck tone than fretboard, I find that completely reasonable. Now, I would never know if it had or not but that's okay... It's more the thought that counts :toothy12:
Okay but seriously, its not just tone... If it's just tone, I would just get the neck wood as a fretboard too (in this case, I could have). Obviously, it's also all about the LOOKS :glasses10: The same logic applies to laminate tops on bodies. I don't think people would be happy if their laminate tops were 1/2" or carved 3/4" thick... it would tonally affect the main body wood. Same logic here. Just as many people want the beauty of a laminate top without/barely changing the tonal characteristics of the body wood, I want the beauty of a veneer fretboard without/barely changing the tonal characteristics of the neck wood.
FYI, with projects, I can get very meticulous and obsessive... Not that I have OCD but you get the point :laughing7: