Death by Uberschall said:
http://soundclick.com/share?songid=5245157
Ok, here ya go. I recorded this a while back while trying to get a good sound with different mics and mic placements, and trying some different amp eq settings, delays, etc. Not a finished product, just me doodling for the sake of recording.
You basically have two tracks to choose from in that track, rhythm and lead. One is a boosted Tweed Deluxe, the other came from my POD XTLive. Tell us which is the vintage tube amp and which is the POD, and why you believe it to be so. :icon_thumright:
First, I'm not home and won't be til Monday eve (labor day weekend par-tay-ing)... so no cans ATM (laptop speakers).
Second, by throwing in a boost, you're not being "pure" with the comparison... you're "cheating". In other words, if I took my JTM45 and
slapped on as much gain and compression as you seem to like with a boost of my own, sure I can make my JTM45 sound solid state and non-dynamic like a POD, too.
Third, you need to tell us *what* you're using to boost the tweed with... and any other relevant info.
Finally, a true tone test would go like this: Try "amp for amp"... do your tweed deluxe,
sans boost... and then do your POD on the tweed setting; let the amps speak for themselves without adding anything extra to hide the sh!tty t00b-amp-dynamics performace of the modeler by playing stuff that's super-hi-gain, which masks the dynamics in *both* amps.
In the meantime, hold that thought for Monday eve... I
will listen then with my cans regardless.
Addendum: Any modeling amp can model hi-gain tone (i.e. super-boosted t00b amp) reasonably well, because there's
no amp dynamics going on in *either* case.
Addendum: As well, I've *got* to do my own comparison clips, too.