D
dwayneed
Guest
I don't remember the term 'hair metal' even existing then. You were either a 'poser' or not. VH were not posers. Bon Jovi was. for example....
tfarny said:In order to be considered for possible hair metal status you require:
1. A blown out perm, and at least one guy with major feathering.
2. Multiple guys with fringey things on their clothes
3. Bandanna(s)
4. Stripper-type white girls in yer videos
5. A major power ballad as a hit. Bic time!
Grunge may not have produced many guitarists (Kim Thayil and...), but as a purifying force in fashion it did have its uses....
tfarny said:In order to be considered for possible hair metal status you require:
1. A blown out perm, and at least one guy with major feathering.
2. Multiple guys with fringey things on their clothes
3. Bandanna(s)
4. Stripper-type white girls in yer videos
5. A major power ballad as a hit. Bic time!
Super Turbo Deluxe Custom said:tfarny said:In order to be considered for possible hair metal status you require:
1. A blown out perm, and at least one guy with major feathering.
2. Multiple guys with fringey things on their clothes
3. Bandanna(s)
4. Stripper-type white girls in yer videos
5. A major power ballad as a hit. Bic time!
You just described Skynyrd, which ain't hair metal.
Vol. Knob said:What I really wanna see is a "Hair Metal Tribute to Grunge" band. Imagine hair metal garb, guitar pyrotechnics, high pitched sissy vocals, loads of reverb, overdramatic drumming, but Nirvana and Soundgarden songs. That would be sweet!
Vol. Knob said:I'm also amazed at how seriously the discussion is being taken, in terms of identifying just what "Hair Metal" is or isnt. I think that if a band looks like all you need to do is put a dress on the lead vocalist to have him look like a cross-dresser, than its "Hair Metal", regardless of whether or not the music sounds like rock or country.
tfarny said:Were we being serious? I wasn't aware! Any category of music that includes Stryper cannot really be taken seriously, can it?
Super Turbo Deluxe Custom said:tfarny said:Were we being serious? I wasn't aware! Any category of music that includes Stryper cannot really be taken seriously, can it?
If you ignore the cheesy, predictable lyrics, they were as tight as any band of the day.
hannaugh said:What about those guys that did "Balls to the Walls"? That was pretty bad.
Those were all from the first album 5150, give a listen to OU812, there's a lot of bad ass tracks on that cd. Even on For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge, that is a total kick ass cd. And one of the greatest songs they ever did was one for the movie Twister, called Humans Being, give a listen to that. And you also have to consider that musicians tastes change and evolve just like everyone else. When I was in my teens my dad listened to classical music and I couldn't stand it. But when I was about 21-22 I saw the movie Amadeus about Mozart, and have had a love for his work ever since. :dontknow:guitlouie said:It's not even so much a Hagar Vs, Roth thing. Roth was annoying as shitee. But listen to Eddie playing Eruption, and listen to Eddie playing the elevator music that is Dreams. Where has the FIRE gone Ed? I dunno, but it IS GONE. Atomic Punk Vs Summer Nights. Mean Streets Vs. Top Of the World. And On and On. It is clearly not the same young inventive band.