jackthehack
Epic Member
- Messages
- 5,630
"Uh, yeah it is. If it was that simple, everyone would have nukes wouldnt they? The principle is easy, same as time travel. I think someone may have seen the "Manhattan Project" one to many times. The ability to construct a real working weapon (i.e. not a "dirty" bomb) is night and day difficult requiring the utmost precision in materials, construction and timing, where many, very carefully organized and timed events must happen within picoseconds of each other in the proper order, otherwise you should have just stayed home and used a few pounds of C4/HMX to begin with."
Everyone can't make nukes because they cannot obtain/produce enough fissionable material easily.
You are mistaking concepts:
- A dirty bomb does not even need to contain fissionable material, you COULD use those, but it would be easier to use other radioactive materials used in the medical or other industries. You simply pack radioactive materials into/around a conventional explosive device; there is no explosive damage outside of that caused by the conventional explosives, the aim is to contaminate an area with the radioactive material
- If you have enough U-235/U238 material, you CAN build a very simple atomic bomb of the type dropped on Hiroshima; there were ca. 60 Kg of fissionable material in the Hiroshima device, and it basically IS just as simple as shooting X mass to Y mass at high enough speed.
- The bomb dropped on Nagasaki (and all currently deployed nuclear weapons) are MUCH more sophisticated. It only contained ca. 8 kilograms of plutonium and had to be constructed in a manner in which explosives surrounding the plutonium in all exploded exactly simultaneously to implode the plutonium into itself to set off the reaction. That is a very simplified explanation, there's a lot more to it than that, and you are correct that it is highly improbable that terrorists could ever hope to construct such a device.
Everyone can't make nukes because they cannot obtain/produce enough fissionable material easily.
You are mistaking concepts:
- A dirty bomb does not even need to contain fissionable material, you COULD use those, but it would be easier to use other radioactive materials used in the medical or other industries. You simply pack radioactive materials into/around a conventional explosive device; there is no explosive damage outside of that caused by the conventional explosives, the aim is to contaminate an area with the radioactive material
- If you have enough U-235/U238 material, you CAN build a very simple atomic bomb of the type dropped on Hiroshima; there were ca. 60 Kg of fissionable material in the Hiroshima device, and it basically IS just as simple as shooting X mass to Y mass at high enough speed.
- The bomb dropped on Nagasaki (and all currently deployed nuclear weapons) are MUCH more sophisticated. It only contained ca. 8 kilograms of plutonium and had to be constructed in a manner in which explosives surrounding the plutonium in all exploded exactly simultaneously to implode the plutonium into itself to set off the reaction. That is a very simplified explanation, there's a lot more to it than that, and you are correct that it is highly improbable that terrorists could ever hope to construct such a device.