Leaderboard

Proof

mayfly said:
About 25 years ago I read an article on Alex Lifeson in Guitar Player magazine.  The interviewer was asking why live he did every solo note for note as it was on the record (this was very unusual at the time).  Here's what I remember about his response:

"I got fed up with going to see guitarists in famous bands that I really admired and looked up to not playing the solo as it was on the record.  Seeing them live was always a big disappointment.  It was like "that was my favorite solo of all time!  The guy's a bum!"

Since Rush started out as a bit of a Led Zep clone, I speculate that he's talking about Page  :glasses10:

I can appreciate where he's coming from, but it's got to get boring going into jukebox mode night after night, always playing stuff the same way all the time. I know I wouldn't be able to do it.
 
GoDrex said:
mayfly said:
About 25 years ago I read an article on Alex Lifeson in Guitar Player magazine.  The interviewer was asking why live he did every solo note for note as it was on the record (this was very unusual at the time).  Here's what I remember about his response:

"I got fed up with going to see guitarists in famous bands that I really admired and looked up to not playing the solo as it was on the record.  Seeing them live was always a big disappointment.  It was like "that was my favorite solo of all time!  The guy's a bum!"

Since Rush started out as a bit of a Led Zep clone, I speculate that he's talking about Page  :glasses10:

I can appreciate where he's coming from, but it's got to get boring going into jukebox mode night after night, always playing stuff the same way all the time. I know I wouldn't be able to do it.

Maybe he feels differently 25 years on  :icon_biggrin:
 
Ah yes, Rush...one of my all time favorites for sure.....even today when you see them play, the solos are pretty much note for note...lol.....Im sure as a player it may get a bit boring, but it may also explain why the music of Rush is so melodically complex and interesting.  A player can only get better if every note is considered sacred as he said, Im thinking it would only help to make future composing even more interesting and of a much higher caliber as there would be more "refined" experience to draw from.

Can you imagine how awesome Yngwie Malmsteen would be if he would play every solo he ever wrote note for note in concert.....mind blowing for sure.... the only thing I never liked about his live performances were that alot of his spontaneous solos were dull and repetitive and he rarely played his songs as he wrote them....If he had I think he would have been regarded even greater than he was.
 
Superbeast520 said:
... the only thing I never liked about his live performances...

I watched the Live in Brazil DVD. Whereas most concerts are songs occasionally interrupted by unaccompanied solos, Yngwie is just the opposite. It seemed like it was just one long solo spot and about three times an hour the band would walk back on and play for a few minutes...
 
I work with my computer for at least a few hours every day, and I've gotten really familiar with the concerts at www.sugarmegs.org. It's almost shocking how vibrant and alive the older stuff sounds from the late-Duane Allman Brothers, the 1st-edition Mahavishnu, the glory years of the Grateful Dead (1972-1974). Back then, bands were not trying to "put on a show", they didn't give a rat's ass about hitting exactly the right notes or the right facial expressions - they were trying to grab hold of the universe and warp it for a few hours. Dial up the Allmans last few recordings with Duane, 71-8-27 and 71-9-16.

http://tela.sugarmegs.org/_asxtela/AllmanBrothersBand1971-06-27FillmoreEastNYC.asx

"Elizabeth Reed" starts at 20:04, Duane's solo starts at 27:59. It's completely different than the live album version, and sure he hits a few clams. But it KILLS, in a way poor Alex Lifeson could never even understand. Duane's not even trying to "put on a show" - he's got higher goals. The triumph of robot rock 'n' roll has been a sad thing... If you listen to a sugarmegs concert of the "new" Allmans, post-2001 with Warren Haynes & Derek Trucks, it sounds extremely competent, well-played - and tame and dull as shit.

The difference between Page on his best nights, and McLaughlin, Garcia & Allman on their best was that *you get good at what you work at.* Page was a genius songwriter, arranger, engineer.... when he tried to veer into hippieland ("Dazed and Confused"), ugh. The others very specifically practiced and worked towards using their guitars as mind-control weapons.  :evil4:

My favorite bands and players of this new century all record live with the band for the most part, at least the base tracks. Listen to OHM, Julien Kasper and Oz Noy, and see if they sound different to you than Joe Bonamassa, John Mayer or any of the other meticulous "heroes." Knowing how to improvise is no "gift", it's a result of a lot of hard work.
 
Speaking of Jimmy Page...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mi5HwZ1GOsk

Does his playing on the solo (3:20 onward) seem a little strange to anyone else? There's just that one flick of the wrist that doesn't quite match up with the music...
 
exalted said:
Speaking of Jimmy Page...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mi5HwZ1GOsk

Does his playing on the solo (3:20 onward) seem a little strange to anyone else? There's just that one flick of the wrist that doesn't quite match up with the music...

the whole thing was off...even the vocals...
 
Back
Top