Pelagaard said:Man, Gibson's really going full Rickenbacker... You never go full Rickenbacker...
The Aaron said:I think I still have enough in the tank for one more big tantrum.
Ideas, anyone?
Pelagaard said:Man, Gibson's really going full Rickenbacker... You never go full Rickenbacker...
:toothy12:musicispeace said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aljGgg70Pg
I had to laugh when they said they plan on suing bass players for not being guitarists and buying their guitars. Great spoof video on Gibson but sadly too close to the truth.
DangerousR6 said:Pelagaard said:Man, Gibson's really going full Rickenbacker... You never go full Rickenbacker...![]()
DangerousR6 said:True but the US trademark registration generally allows the trademark to be protected the trademark for ten years. During this timeframe, the mark must be continuously monitored by the owner or representative of the company.
Toulouse_Tuhles said:Gibson's mistake was going after PRS. They didn't think PRS would fight vigorously, or had deep enough pockets, or would risk defending themselves against "the giant" Gibson. What Gibson thought was almost a no brainer, PRS fought and won in court.
Precedent set by that case.
Now, they need to go after small companies that cannot defend themselves in order to reverse the precedent bit by bit.
Its a nasty game of civil litigation to achieve dominance.
I got better ideas. Build decent and affordable products. Reinstate smaller dealers, instead of having them "continuously maintain $250,000 of inventory displayed on the wall". Ditch MAP pricing.