Leaderboard

Another Angled Neck Pocket Problem? ***UPDATE (page 3)***

pabloman said:
Is the front of the bridge bottomed out yet? If you still have room to move keep going. If the action and playability were good before then the neck adjustment shouldn't be necessary. Make one adjustment at a time. Set your neck relief first and don't touch it again. Then tackle the bridge. It will most likely have to be set with a slight rake to it. How is the bridge radius? Is that set for the neck you have?

Sorry Pabloman, I guess I wasn't very clear.  Firstly, the action and playability previously were acceptable, but not where I really like it.  Trying to get just a minimal amount of float in the trem is what has uncovered what I believe to be an inadequately angled neck pocket. 

But I do appreciate the suggestions, nevertheless.  :eek:ccasion14:  That said...

The way the Floyd is mounted over the non-recessed route, there is plenty of room to lower the bridge further.  But that will not be a solution.  As the trem is lowered, then the tail of the trem starts to lay on the body, which is what I am trying to avoid.  I already have it setup with a slight rake, which brings the saddles to their lowest possible point.  Any more of a rake and the bar will not be useful for diving, let alone already not being able to pull up on it.  Then, it might as well be a hard tail.

And, as always, I only made one adjustment at a time.  My commentary previously was to state all of the things that I have done.  I did not do them all at once without looking at the effect each individual adjustment had on the overall setup.  The bridge radius is definitely set for the neck radius. 

The problem is that there is not enough of an angle in the neck pocket.  My choices are to shim the pocket or to just have the tech extend the Floyd route to be partially recessed.  I am leaning towards the latter.  It would still look like a non-recessed, but would allow the bridge to sit about 1/8" lower and still have about 1/16" to float.  There is still plenty of room to lower the posts more than 1/8" without bottoming out.
 
Send it back.  They will have to fix it or replace it.  Last I heard, mine was just getting paint.  They will make it right!  :icon_thumright:
 
fdesalvo said:
Send it back.  They will have to fix it or replace it.  Last I heard, mine was just getting paint.  They will make it right!  :icon_thumright:

Funny you should mention that.  After the dismissal of an email I got from Warmoth when I first brought it to their attention, I responded with a cordial but clearly dissatisfied email.  Apparently, it caught someone's attention, because I got this email back later today:

Hello Brent,

I’m sorry to hear you’re having issues with the VIP. On our carved tops there is an intrinsic angle cut into the neck pocket and pickup routes to match the body profile. With most bridges this is enough of an angle. However, I’d like to look into the option of cutting a larger pocket for you for the top mount Floyd if it’s required. Most people get the recessed Floyd option on the VIP, so I haven’t heard about a problem with the top mount as of yet. But I will explore it.

If you’d like to send the body back for inspection and possible neck pocket adjustment, you may useRA#CH090915. I can have my shipping dept send you a label.

Let me know how you would like to proceed.

Kind regards,

Christina Hudson
Warmoth Guitar Products, Inc.
Product Development Coordinator,
Customer Service Support Manager
PHONE 253-845-0403
www.warmoth.com
 
Bingo.

People can request the "big angle" for neck pockets to avoid this going forward.
 
fdesalvo said:
Bingo.

People can request the "big angle" for neck pockets to avoid this going forward.

When I ordered, I had no idea this would be an issue.  Firstly, I have never ordered a non-recessed Floyd.  I assumed they had all these details worked out.  Secondly, it is obvious in retrospect, but I did not even consider the likelihood that the neck pocket would need to have a slightly steeper angle for a carved top than for a flat top.  Regardless, I thought that they would have all these details worked out.  But, perhaps a non-recessed Floyd on a carved top is uncommon enough that the issue has never arisen with Warmoth before.  As the Customer Service Manager said in her email, most people order the recessed Floyd.  To be sure, all of the Warmoths I have with Floyds are recessed.  The only reason I ordered this one non-recessed is because I wanted to incorporate differences between this VIP and my other one, but did not want it to be a hard-tail.  In retrospect, I am wishing I would have gotten the recessed Floyd.  I may ask her if that would be an option going forward.

In the end, I'm sure it will all be done correctly.  It is just annoying to have to disassemble the guitar, ship it back to them, wait, then reassemble when I get the guitar back.  On the flip side, my tech is willing to route a small recess on the tail side of the Floyd route to accommodate the part of the bridge that is landing on the body.  This small route would make this one area under the bridge the same height it would be if the guitar was a flat top.  There would be no need for a neck shim or pocket modification, and he would do the disassembly and assembly.  It's not free, but is not horribly expensive, either.  He would charge $100, and this would include setup and intonation.  If I go with Warmoth, they have no charge to correct this, but I would still have to pay about $60 for the setup and intonation after I get the body back and reassemble it.  Going with Warmoth keeps the warranty for this issue intact. 

If I had time, I could do the small routing modification with my Dremel, and I still might do that.  The only disassemly required would be to remove the strings and the Floyd.

Thank you to everyone who has offered their suggestions in this thread.  All of the suggestions have been helpful.  Writing this all out has been helpful to me in thinking through the options.  I think at this point I am just going to either have my local tech take care of it or to cut the small route extension myself.  I would hate to disassemble the entire body, ship it, wait, reassemble, and find out that it still has an issue.  This is not likely, but possible.
 
The quickest/easiest method I have found for making a "wedged" shim is the masking tape method. Basically you just stack concentric layers of masking tape. It's cheap to experiment with different thicknesses, etc. I'm sure YouTube has a video of someone showing how to do it. I've used it several times and it works great.

As to the notion that non-tapered wedges are going to eventually ruin a neck - that is a phantom-fear, IMO. There are millions of necks out there shimmed with guitar picks, business cards, coins, scraps of leather, metal plates, etc, etc, etc. that have functioned just fine for decades. I suppose damage could happen in theory, but in the time it would take for that to happen you would most likely have a whole slough of other age-related problems with your neck.

As far the neck pocket angle, please keep in mind that when a company is making a factory model, fully assembled guitar, all the variables can be factored in. There is only a finite amount of hardware and other contingencies to worry about, and all the perfect angles can established. However, as you all know, Warmoth does not sell completed guitars. We sell parts. It is a never-ending task around here trying to make sure that all the myriad parts we offer are compatible with all the other parts we offer, including all the possible variations of each and every part. This isn't even taking into account the dizzying range of hardware people want to use. Most certainly some tweaking is occasionally going to be necessary.

When it comes to angled neck pockets, or any neck pockets for that matter, it's impossible to have one standard that fits all set-ups. Too many variables to consider; fret height, particular bridge, fingerboard radius, owner preferences, etc. Shims are a part of the trade and there is nothing at all wrong with using them.
 
Hey, DoubleA!  Thanks for your input on this.  It is greatly appreciated. 

double A said:
The quickest/easiest method I have found for making a "wedged" shim is the masking tape method. Basically you just stack concentric layers of masking tape. It's cheap to experiment with different thicknesses, etc. I'm sure YouTube has a video of someone showing how to do it. I've used it several times and it works great.

I've never heard of this, but it is an interesting idea.  Does one use the masking tape to identify the dimensions of the shim that is needed, then use that as a model to make a shim out of something more solid, like wood?  Or is the masking tape construct actually used as the final shim? 

As to the notion that non-tapered wedges are going to eventually ruin a neck - that is a phantom-fear, IMO. There are millions of necks out there shimmed with guitar picks, business cards, coins, scraps of leather, metal plates, etc, etc, etc. that have functioned just fine for decades. I suppose damage could happen in theory, but in the time it would take for that to happen you would most likely have a whole slough of other age-related problems with your neck.

This is good to know.  The base of the neck that accepts the mounting screws indeed is the thickest chunk of wood in a neck, so it makes sense that it would take a LOT to actually warp this part of the neck.

As far the neck pocket angle, please keep in mind that when a company is making a factory model, fully assembled guitar, all the variables can be factored in. There is only a finite amount of hardware and other contingencies to worry about, and all the perfect angles can established. However, as you all know, Warmoth does not sell completed guitars. We sell parts. It is a never-ending task around here trying to make sure that all the myriad parts we offer are compatible with all the other parts we offer, including all the possible variations of each and every part. This isn't even taking into account the dizzying range of hardware people want to use. Most certainly some tweaking is occasionally going to be necessary.

When it comes to angled neck pockets, or any neck pockets for that matter, it's impossible to have one standard that fits all set-ups. Too many variables to consider; fret height, particular bridge, fingerboard radius, owner preferences, etc. Shims are a part of the trade and there is nothing at all wrong with using them.

I fully understand this.  As a testament to Warmoth (and the wide-ranging compatibilities), I've built 19 Warmoths and this is the first one to have such an issue.  And, admittedly, the non-recessed Floyd on a carved top body is an unusual request.  I greatly appreciate Christina taking ownership of the issue; I hope that I did not imply otherwise.  I will say that the sales person I first notified of this issue initially wasn't the most helpful.  I had to push the issue a bit further.  That said, I'm sure they have to deal with a lot of people who have unrealistic expectations or desires.  It's probably only after someone provides them not only with details of the problem but also potential causes and solutions that they realize that it really is a potential issue that should be dealt with on their end.  This is fine, by me.  I will say, though, that the specs for the body all came from the build page; there was nothing so unusual that I had to pick up the phone to inquire about something off-menu.  The VIP carved top is a standard body.  The compound radius is a Warmoth standard.  The 6100 frets are the tallest ones offered by Warmoth (other frets would have increased the distance from the strings to the fret crown, but this might not even be perceptible) .  The Original Floyd Rose is an industry standard.  "Non-recessed OFR with angled neck pocket" is a check-box on the order page, with a $10 upcharge.  Like I said previously, the angle in the neck pocket is probably perfect for a flat top body, but it apparently is not enough of an angle for a carved top.  So, we learned something.  Or, at least I did.  It's all good.  In the end, as long as Warmoth is willing to accept that it is a true issue and that it can be corrected relatively easily (either by Warmoth or on my end), I am satisfied.  It might be a short-term inconvenience, but after it is corrected, I'm going to have one very sweet VIP, thanks to well-made "parts" by Warmoth.  With all due respect, shims are definitely "part of the trade."  Perhaps my expectations are unrealistic.  It just seems to me that if all of the option choices made in specifying the build of the body are listed in the standard choices offered, then no compensatory modifications should be necessary to make the final product playable.  If I was trying to replace a body or neck and the guitar I was repairing/upgrading used some non-menu items in its construction, such as a bridge not listed, or a non-Strat neck pocket, then I wouldn't think twice about using a shim.  I also wouldn't think twice about a shim if I was building a guitar and was using parts not sold by Warmoth with dimensions different than those listed in the construct menus (such as bridge height) or a non-Warmoth neck.  But again, it's all good.  At this point, I'm fairly certain this issue will be able to be resolved without the use of a shim.

Thank you again for your input on this thread.  I really helps to have a Warmoth insider participate and be involved in the forum and to help resolve issues such as this one.  :eek:ccasion14:
 
Hey DocNrock,
When you build a wedged shim out of masking tape, it's not a template. It becomes your actual, permanent shim. Once compressed between the body and neck it's every bit as dense as a wooden shim, and when you think about it, it actually is made of wood. :)

Also, I just realized I said "concentric layers of masking tape", which makes no sense. I meant "successive layers of masking tape"...you know, in sort of a stair-step configuration.

As far as all the rest...Christina knows what's up and will be able to help you out.
 
double A said:
Hey DocNrock,
When you build a wedged shim out of masking tape, it's not a template. It becomes your actual, permanent shim. Once compressed between the body and neck it's every bit as dense as a wooden shim, and when you think about it, it actually is made of wood. :)

Also, I just realized I said "concentric layers of masking tape", which makes no sense. I meant "successive layers of masking tape"...you know, in sort of a stair-step configuration.

As far as all the rest...Christina knows what's up and will be able to help you out.

I hadn't even thought about masking tape and wood being the same, but you're right!  I now get it regarding the successive layers in a stair-step config.  That would also make the shim far less compressible than if it was made by wrapping tape around itself, concentrically. 

Now I have a question.  Roughly how much of the shim height is lost after the neck screws are tightened down?

I think I am going to give this a try.  If for no other reason, it will give me an idea as to how much more angle the neck pocket needs.  It might also obviate the need for me to disassemble, and then later reassemble, the guitar.  Thanks!
 
First, let me say that the following information is NOT official Warmoth tech support. It is just one guitar dude talking to another.  :headbang: What follows is just general information on how to make a masking tape shim.

With that said:

I spent a few minutes Googling and could not find much info about making a shim from masking tape, which surprised me. I'll try to give you a quick set of instructions:

1. Lay your neck down on a piece of paper, and trace the perimeter of the heel. Now you have a guide that shows exactly the size of your neck pocket.
2. Leaving about an extra inch around your tracing in all directions, cut your piece of paper down to a smaller size that's easier to handle. Then turn the piece of paper upside down so that your guidelines are on the underside. You do NOT want to stick your masking tape over the side with the tracing...you will need to see it later in step 7.
3. Put a piece of masking tape on the paper so that is covers the entire area of your tracing.
4. Now put another piece of masking tape over the last, but move it back about 1/8" of an inch from edge you want to be the thin end of the shim.
5. Now put another piece of masking tape over the last, moving it back about another 1/8" of an inch from the edge of the previous piece.
6. Continue in this fashion until the entire area of the shim is covered.
7. Now flip the shim over to see your tracing on the underside. Now you can use a pair of scissors to cut out a shim that will fit perfectly in your neck pocket, and be a perfect wedge.
8. Use a paper punch to punch out holes in the shim so the neck screws can pass through.
9. Enjoy your new shim!

Plan on making a few shims in order to get the hang of it, and get the spacing of your tape just right. For a thinner shim, move each successive layer of tape back further than 1/8"....maybe 3/16" or 1/4". It WILL require some experimenting to get it just right. The first time I did this it took me four tries to get it right. The last time I did this it took me two tries. Once you get a good shim, however, this method works really well.

Not much is lost in the compression...maybe 1 or 2 tenths of a millimeter. I usually try to shoot for a shim that is 1.5mm at the thick end, put the guitar together and see how it works, then make adjustments as necessary on a new shim.

Hope that helps.
 
double A said:
First, let me say that the following information is NOT official Warmoth tech support. It is just one guitar dude talking to another.  :headbang: What follows is just general information on how to make a masking tape shim.

With that said:

I spent a few minutes Googling and could not find much info about making a shim from masking tape, which surprised me. I'll try to give you a quick set of instructions:

1. Lay your neck down on a piece of paper, and trace the perimeter of the heel. Now you have a guide that shows exactly the size of your neck pocket.
2. Leaving about an extra inch around your tracing in all directions, cut your piece of paper down to a smaller size that's easier to handle. Then turn the piece of paper upside down so that your guidelines are on the underside. You do NOT want to stick your masking tape over the side with the tracing...you will need to see it later in step 7.
3. Put a piece of masking tape on the paper so that is covers the entire area of your tracing.
4. Now put another piece of masking tape over the last, but move it back about 1/8" of an inch from edge you want to be the thin end of the shim.
5. Now put another piece of masking tape over the last, moving it back about another 1/8" of an inch from the edge of the previous piece.
6. Continue in this fashion until the entire area of the shim is covered.
7. Now flip the shim over to see your tracing on the underside. Now you can use a pair of scissors to cut out a shim that will fit perfectly in your neck pocket, and be a perfect wedge.
8. Use a paper punch to punch out holes in the shim so the neck screws can pass through.
9. Enjoy your new shim!

Plan on making a few shims in order to get the hang of it, and get the spacing of your tape just right. For a thinner shim, move each successive layer of tape back further than 1/8"....maybe 3/16" or 1/4". It WILL require some experimenting to get it just right. The last first time I did this it took my four tries to get it right. The last time I did this it took me two tries. Once you get a good shim, however, this method works really well.

Not much is lost in the compression...maybe 1 or 2 tenths of a millimeter.

Hope that helps.

Wow!  Thank you for the detailed description!  There is another guitar that I want to try this on, as well.  I have an old Strat body with a recessed Floyd that I want to make into a non-recessed.  After that, it will need a shim.  It will be the perfect project to use for shim experimentation. 

:eek:ccasion14:
 
FINAL UPDATE (I hope  :icon_biggrin:):

I was going to go ahead and send the body back for the warranty consideration, as offered.  I picked it up from the tech before he had started on it.  After removing the strings and the Floyd, it became apparent to me that not only was the Floyd resting on the body on the tail side, but, as some of you suggested early on, it was also making contact under the front side.  It didn't look like it was, because that area was covered by the base plate.  Each of the screws that hold down the individual saddles were digging into the finish. 

Before I go on, I want to say that I greatly appreciate Christina's offer to take care of this under warranty.  I also understand that after working on it myself that any further warranty coverage for this issue is voided. 

That said, it was clear to me that it would be a lot less work to just modify the body around the trem route than it would be to completely disassemble the body, ship it back, then reassemble it after it comes back to me.  A modification that should work was just staring at me.  So, after trimming away a bit of wood on the tail and neck side of the trem route, protecting the bare wood with flat black paint, putting everything back together, and doing all the necessary adjustments (springs, bridge height, neck, etc.), I now have a VIP with what is essentially a non-recessed Floyd that floats, dives and pulls up (!), and has outstanding action and playability.

I think the fundamental problem here was a non-recessed Floyd on a carved-top body.  Christina from Warmoth confirmed that it is an unusual request.  I think the angled neck-pocket would have been adequate for a flat-top body.  For a carved top, it would need a steeper angle.  Alternatively, a "semi-recessed" Floyd worked out with the existing angled pocket.  The wood that I removed basically just removed the peak of the top contour in the area around the base of the Floyd.  I probably should have just ordered a recessed Floyd.  Oh well, it works now.  :eek:ccasion14:

Thank you all for contributing to the thread.  In the end, I think I used a bit of everyone's input, either to diagnose, or to remedy the problem. 

And to Double A, I will send Christina an email separately thanking her for her offer. 

:rock-on:

If anyone cares to hear Ansel, I posted a short video under the Studio and Sessions subforum.  And yes, the Floyd gets used a bit.  :laughing7: 

Sorry Cagey, it was still done with the iPhone, but I did some tweaks and I think the audio is a bit better.

http://unofficialwarmoth.com/index.php?topic=25573.msg367974#msg367974
 
Hey! 

Last week I was told the new body hit the paint shop, so I by it'll she out this week. It's goin to be a really different look this time. One I've never seen. It could be a totally flop or the coolest thing I ever saw lol.  If you don't see me post up, you'll know which scenario unfolded haha.
 
fdesalvo said:
Hey! 

Last week I was told the new body hit the paint shop, so I by it'll she out this week. It's goin to be a really different look this time. One I've never seen. It could be a totally flop or the coolest thing I ever saw lol.  If you don't see me post up, you'll know which scenario unfolded haha.

Different color, or???  Or is that a secret until the unveiling?
 
It'll have a clear maple top with white binding and surf green back :). Going for a modern-retro 50s theme.
 
fdesalvo said:
It'll have a clear maple top with white binding and surf green back :). Going for a modern-retro 50s theme.

Oh, that's right!  Now I remember!  Very cool.  Same pickups?  Or something surf-style?  Lipsticks?
 
Man if I'd have thought of lipsticks first..I've got a pair of white BK 63s and a chrome covered Abraxas waiting for her! 
 
Back
Top