Every piece of wood is unique. Therefore, every Strat will sound a little bit different. I currently have 4 alder Strats and 4 poplar Strats. I also have a few LP style guitars with mahogany bodies made of African sapele, and one of them even had a super heavy basswood body. Of the many guitars that I have owned and sold in music retail, Gibson's made of mahogany have the most tonal variance (not variety) and the biggest differences in weight from body to body. Basswood also has a huge variation in tone and weight. My LP copy made of basswood sounded better than most genuine LesPaul's that I sold in my day. It had great mid-range and sustain. Alder, however, is the most consistent tone wood I know with the least variation in tone and weight. It's a great all-rounder that just sounds good. Now where does poplar fit in? Apart from the green streaks, poplar is very similar to alder in weight and tone, and in fact, I often prefer the punchier attack of my poplar Strats to my genuine Strats made of alder. Alder is generally louder and smoother sounding with poplar being slightly quieter but punchier and brighter. In other words, of my alder and poplar strats that have the same hardware and pickups, the alder strat is smooth, creamy, lush stratty sounding. The poplar version is as if Blackmore rocked up with his 70's Strat which had a treble boost or something (think of early Rainbow live recordings). Poplar lacks mid-range (a bit) and some bass frequencies but accentuates the highs. It cuts through. It appears to have a wee bit less sustain - but that could be my old strings. My super strat combination is a roasted maple neck with stainless steel frets AND a roasted poplar body. But that's just my personal choice. Both alder and poplar are great tone wood choices with basswood and mahogany coming in at last. If you must have a mahogany kind of tone, go with Sapele. It's an African type of mahogany but with a tad more treble.
which does not actually exist anywhere on planet Earth. The definition of an AI used to be an independently thinking machine whose thoughts are not directed by programming.. that can make complex decisions and bla bla bla. People are now giddy and think their mobile phone is alive because it talks to them 
. Chat GPT is not alive, it can only do what it is programmed to do. The goal of programmers is that they program the machine so that it appears that the machine is alive - but it isn't. It does not have truly independent thought. Although Musk calls his primitive rocket "Starship", it will never reach any star other than our own. Same with quantum computers, A.I. etc. Everyone embellishes their capabilities. The average A.I. call centre is not much better than an 80's answering machine but they are referred to "smart" and "interactive" when they are not. 
....I can't afford to rent as it's dead money where I live. Besides, I couldn't knock down walls in a rental premises. I hope to move in in 8 weeks.
