A.I.,
which does not actually exist anywhere on planet Earth.
While true in the purest sense, this is akin to arguing against using "tremolo" as opposed to "vibrato." Yes, that's the correct statement to make, but it flies against popular convention which -- no matter how wrong it really is -- has taken over common lexicon enough to where there's no victory to be had.
Like how people use 's to make plurals of words.
Or write "could of" and "should of."
Or "comprised of."
Or xerox to mean photocopying or kleenex to mean tissue paper (lower case letters in those brand names were deliberate).
Yes, I regularly experience raised blood pressure when I see it. Yes, I argue stridently against it. No, I'm not going to win.
Also, since you're new to this community, there's a backstory to the suspicion of AI/bot accounts. The writing style of your post about woods may not have all the hallmarks of an AI engine, but when there's a new user who waxes academic about a topic, there are suspicions raised. We (this forum) get assaulted on a somewhat regular basis by a rash of bot accounts that are getting better and better about text writing styles.
Plus the resurrection of a zombie thread is another hallmark of bots that react based on search engine results and not community context.
It may
seem like an obsession to you, but it's really not. These are the reasons. So welcome to the community, and I hope this helps you in learning the culture in this forum.
(or, also, using "route" instead of "rout")
