Jcurl02 said:
Hey guys, this started out as a rhetorical question on a seperate thread but it got me thinking.....
What makes a Tele a Tele or a Strat a Strat or a LP an LP?
When you look at it, isn't a Tele and an LP just a single cut away?
Isn't a Strat and a Soloist just a double cut away? SG?
Is it the body shape? Headstock shape? Is it the pickup setup? Then what does a Tele Custom fall into? Is it a comination of two or three attributes?
How about a Les Paul with a three single coils and a five way? (Never see one, have you?)
Most of us who've made our own creations take (what we desire or deam) to be the best of each design and creat our own. So, what what makes it what it is?
(I think for simplisticity's sake, we mostly fall in to the body to pick the style)
Here is a test.... Here is my vintage 80's Gretsch BST 1000. (If you were to make a similar one yourself). How would you classify it? Tele, LP? For years I said it was a less expensive version of a Les Paul. Now-a-days I'm leaning towards a modified Tele.
By the way, the Gretsch is SWEET!. DiMarzio pups, zero fret, US Made. I still have all the case candy and sales tickets as I'm the origianl owner! My first electric!
Quality is what makes a Strat and Tele. Lack of quality is what makes a Les Paul. :toothy12:
On a more serious note, who knows? The feel, sound, look, everything. Why does a Fender feel like a Fender? Why does a Gibson feel like a Gibson? I think there are just attributes that nobody can really put a finger on. Why do some people like Lamborghinis while others like Ferraris? They're both Italian, fast, beautiful, exotic, etc.
In the end, I think it's just a matter of preference. For me, personally, I've never met a Les Paul I've liked. While I love the beefy necks on them, I just don't care for their particular shape, weight, balance, or overall feel. For instance, I LOVE their distinct sound. I can listen to a song and say, "Yep, that's definitely a Les Paul." Unfortunately, there aren't enough attributes about the Les Paul to seal the deal. With Fender, I just connect with them. They're lighter, more comfortable, have a great sound, and they just feel better to me.
As for Teles, sure, I obviously liked one enough to buy one. It has a nice tone and it's a gorgeous instrument, but we're not a match made in heaven. Years ago I purchased it based more on the fact that it was a gorgeous looking, American guitar I liked the feel of, but didn't
love the feel of. It's my go-to guitar for playing some more relaxed stuff but it just doesn't make the cut for what I play the most (the heavy stuff). Playing Metal with that guitar is like trying to play a country song on a Jackson King V; it just doesn't work.
I love everything about an American Strat. I love the way they sound, feel, and play, but I just haven't gotten around to getting one. When I do, I want a David Murray Signature model, or I'll build a Warmoth to similar specs; tremolo, 2 humbuckers, 1 single, etc. While it wouldn't be a
direct replica, it would certainly look the part. David Murray's guitar is the one that made me stand up and take notice, making me want to play a guitar and want a Fender.
...And then there are the radical designs; the Jackson Stars and Warriors, B.C. Rich Warlocks, Ironbirds, and Biches, etc. These guitars look amazing to me, and they balance very well with me. I love the image, and I love some of their sounds. They just really "pop" with me. I just find them to be very comfortable the way they rest in a classical position while I'm sitting, yet fall with a nice balance while standing. I also like the position in which my picking hand rests on their bodies and how the knobs are not in my way.
In the end, Strats, Teles, and LPs be damned, give me another radically designed, pointy guitar! :toothy12: