Leaderboard

Tru Oil on my new Goncalo Alves topped Mahogany Strat?

tt0511

Junior Member
Messages
113
Hi all.  I just ordered a nice strat body with Goncalo Alves laminate top on mahogany back.  Kinda a long story, but I had someone who supposedly knew what they were doing "relic" and 2-tone burst a strat and they totally ruined it.  So, this will be my replacement body.  It's actually turned out to be a replacement "guitar" since I replaced the screwed up neck with a nice Warmoth neck last year.  Now it's on to the body.

My goal with this guitar is to go for tone more than shiny looks, so I used Formby's Tung Oil Finish on that replacement neck and it seemed to work fine (as well as opened up the tone incredibly compared to my original neck with all that poly coating!).  I think I put 3-4 coats on.  It was oily feeling for a couple of months but it feels fine today. 

In regards to the new body, I am not familiar with what Goncalo Alves would look like with an oil finish, or Mahogany for that matter.  I love my Gibson SG in Heritage Cherry red and it would rock to be able to get that color on this guitar body, but I haven't read anything online so far that sounds like I could stain the body and then use oil over it.  And, it sounds like a lot of people have had trouble with Tung Oil so I'm wondering if I should use Tru-Oil which lots of people seem to rave about.

If I could simply put Tru-Oil on the body and that bring out the richness of the wood and give it a wet luster, I'd be happy.  What do you more experienced folks here recommend?  The Mahogany back looked pretty light in color in the Warmoth sales photo.  Would an oil finish darken up the wood and give it good grain accent?

I know there appear to be lots of posts here about finishing and I've read a lot over the past couple of days on the net, but I'm still a little confused about the oils and whether or not a sealer should be used on the wood before oil is applied, etc.  I sure would appreciate some help.

Thanks in advance.
 
Oil finishes, since they are intended to penetrating (or at least semi-penetrating) generally do not require a sealer prior to application. 

You can stain wood prior to applying oil finishes.  This is not 100% foolproof though, depending on the nature of the stain the oil can pull some of it off the wood.  The only way to be 100% sure of what will happen is to try it on a test piece of same/similar wood (or inside a control cavity/some other non-visible area of the piece.)

Tung oil can be tricky if you rush the job.  The main problem that people encounter is excess oil bleeding back out of the pores of the wood after the surface film has dried (leaving nasty little ring marks.)  Also tung does not 'build' so the pores will not fill and it is not a particularly protective finish (it wears very fast and is about as close to raw wood as any finish can be.)  Personally I would not recommend it on  mahogany.

Tru-oil would be better IMO and tends to work well over stains that have properly dried.  Birchwood Casey actually sells stock finishing kits with both Tru-oil and a pigment based wood stain (intended to give the look of dark walnut.)

I've never tried to stain goncalo alves, but it is a hard, dense, and fairly oil wood.  I suspect it would not accept direct stains (pigments or dyes) very well.  I'd expect it to refuse most of the color.  If it absolutely had to have a heritage cherry color I'd use a sprayed on toner of some sort.

GA darkens on exposure to sunlight and takes on a rich red/brown color.  You might try leaving it in the sun for a day or two prior to any finishing.
 
Okay, I found this link (http://www.lmii.com/CartTwo/TruOil.htm) posted in a thread here and it if I read it correctly, using Tru-Oil, I don't have to do any grain filling on the body unless I want a really glossy finish.

Still appreciate any input from you guys.  I'm glad I found this forum.  Good info and some cool guitars!
 
Thanks Keyser!  I did a Google search for oiled mahogany guitars and found a Caparison that looked great just oiled.  So, I believe I'm going to go for nothing but Tru-Oil.  I don't want to risk tung oil bleeding back out of the body.  That would be yucky to play!

Warmoth doesn't have any info on Goncalo Alves on their site that I could find.  Should I leave the GA un-oiled, or should I oil it?

[EDIT: Ahh, ...okay, their info on Goncalo Alves is in the "neck wood" section.  That's why I couldn't find it.  It's a laminate on the "body" and they don't include it in the body woods section.

I'll have to give you guys a report on how the sound of my strat with this new GA/Mah. body compares to the existing swamp ash, with poly oversprayed with nitro.  The neck is birdseye.  The guitar sounds great now, but it would be nice to get a little improvement with this change.]
 
Well, after reading a lot around here it seems CB knows his stuff and he prefers Tung Oil rather than Tru-Oil so now I'm wondering if I shouldn't use Tung Oil.  Keyser doesn't like the idea on mahogany.

I already bought the tru-oil, but I still have most of the can of Formby's Tung Oil Finish that I used on a neck and wonder if I shouldn't just use that.  I could return the tru-oil for a refund.  It seems that a lot of people say you should use a 50/50 mix of Tung and Mineral Spirits for the first 3-4 coats and then decrease the mineral spirits to 25%, but don't go below 25% the rest of the coats.

Can anyone confirm that?  Sounds like cutting it with spirits helps eliminate some of the common problems associated with porous woods.  The main source that I found this at is here:  http://www.woodweb.com/knowledge_base/Finishing_Guitars_with_Tung_Oil.html

I don't know if the Formby's is pure tung, or if it is already "cut" with a solvent as is.

For a newby "project guitar putter-together-er and finisher", my head gets to spinning considering the options and trying to pick out the best one!!!!  Grrr.
 
Well I've tung oiled a couple of bodies and not been very happy with the long-term results, but that was because I wasn't patient and careful and didn't follow CB's directions to the letter. My feeling is that if you have huge patience and and eye for detail, tung oil will probably be the way to go. If you don't, then one of the blended oils like tru or danish is likely easier to use, because it has catalysts to speed the drying / hardening process.
 
Well, I'm an engineer by profession, so attention to detail is a given, lol.  I'm pretty patient, I think I could survive the process though I don't know CB's steps you are referring to.

Here's the procedure one person lays out and it sounds reasonable to me:

"Comment from contributor I:
I have been refinishing wood for years and will use nothing but tung oil. Two things I would suggest. Number one is to thin your tung oil with mineral spirits. When starting with a piece that is stripped or completely bare wood, I start with a 50/50 blend. I use that for two or three coats and do not wipe it off. I apply it evenly. Make your mixture a little more tung oil and a little less mineral spirits as you go, but I would not recommend going to a mixture that is less than 25% mineral spirits. You'll find that it is much easier to work with and keep smooth.

The second thing I would recommend is to not use steel wool between applications. It sounds like you are digging out the tung oil with the steel wool because the steel wool is not completely flat. It will dig out the tung oil in places where the wood grain is softer or slightly indented. You need your abrasive between coats to be completely flat like a piece of very fine sand paper (600 to 1000 grit, wet sandpaper) on a rubber sanding block would be.

For extreme shine like I believe you are looking for, I usually wet sand. You must make sure you allow ample drying between coats but the results are amazing. I have a solid wild cherry buffet I refinished using this method with 16 coats of hand applied and wet sanded tung oil and the finish is like a $50,000 Steinway grand piano."
 
Okay, this must be the procedure you are referring to.  Finally found it.

filler - oil base or water base work equally well

different... just fill the wood well, as any grain impressions will show

process -

fill
sand to 320 grit
repeat until filled totally
cut the tung oil 50/50 with citrus solvent
apply a heavy coat of cut tung oil, and let it soak in well... keep it wet and let it soak
after your satisfied that you have a good soak in, wipe off all the excess.
--> DRY FOR LONG TIME <--- several days to a week*
apply pure uncut tung oil, wipe off excess, let dry a long time*
repeat until you've got a build and look you desire
after the last drying, you can wax and buff for more sheen if desired


*Tung is a polymerizing oil.   It air-dries/oxidizes.  If you re-apply over another not-dry coat, you might get the gummies.   This happens because the new coat seals the air from the old coat, GREATLY slowing overall drying.   You want to WIPE the tung oil off so the body is damn near dry when you get done, then let it dry that way.  THIN as possible coats.   Build thickness with repetition not with thick coats.  Thin coats dry and cure fully and more quickly.   You can apply two thin-thin coats with drying time, faster than one thicker coat... which takes more than twice to dry fully through.

1 Cut the first coat
2 Wipe down really well between coats
3 Thin coating thickness.. thin as possible
4 Use many light and thin coats, and let dry well.

You'll end up with an heirloom finish if you do it that way.


And then the waxing after final curing:

Butcher's White Diamond Paste Wax or Butcher's Boston Polish both work great.  They are the same, with Boston Polish having a very slightly amber tint added, while White Diamond is a "white" (clear) polish.

Personally... I'd go Boston (and I did!~)


Thanks CB for posting this procedure.  That is extremely helpful.
 
My caveats about tung oil on mahogany were specific to true/pure tung oil products.

Formby's is a varnish product that happens to contain some polymerized tung oil.  It will perform very similar to Tru-oil (which is an analagous pruduct based on boiled linseed oil) ie. it does 'build' and will leave a fairly durable/protective film finish.
 
Sweet!  Very cool.  That makes me feel better about what you were saying.  I suppose I should get some grain filler for the mahogany?  And, ...should I cut this kind of tung oil with mineral spirits as mentioned above?
 
Keyser Soze said:
Tung oil can be tricky if you rush the job.  The main problem that people encounter is excess oil bleeding back out of the pores of the wood after the surface film has dried (leaving nasty little ring marks.)  Also tung does not 'build' so the pores will not fill and it is not a particularly protective finish (it wears very fast and is about as close to raw wood as any finish can be.) 

Tru-oil would be better IMO and tends to work well over stains that have properly dried.  Birchwood Casey actually sells stock finishing kits with both Tru-oil and a pigment based wood stain (intended to give the look of dark walnut.)

I've never tried to stain goncalo alves, but it is a hard, dense, and fairly oil wood.  I suspect it would not accept direct stains (pigments or dyes) very well.  I'd expect it to refuse most of the color.   If it absolutely had to have a heritage cherry color I'd use a sprayed on toner of some sort.

Tung - and all oil finishes take a longer period to dry.  Tru-Oil is not really an oil, but a varnish with oil in it.  Its really not like any real oil - linseed or tung.  Formby's Tung, similarly, is an varnish with oil in it... thinned.  Actual tung oil is quite different stuff.  Tung (as opposed to "tung finish") is great over stains, and is almost totally clear. 

The problem you talk about with bleed, is inconsistent with the proper use of real tung oil - which is - to thin the first coat and let it dry, then add additional coats full strength.  Any bleed you have, is due to inadequate drying.  I cant comment on Formby's tung... I used it a few times a long while ago, and have since switched back to real tung oil. 

Real tung oil does, in fact, build up quite nicely, but it takes time and effort to do the finish correctly.  I've done too many rifle stocks in pure tung oil to have lack of build ever be a concern.  It also buffs out really nicely when dried, and feels sort of silky.  The wear properties of all oils is not the best, but, you can always touch them up - and should - on a regular basis. 

Goncalo is not all that hard, as compared to say... maple... and is fairly porous.  It accepts stain well, but keep the stain color in the range of reddish to brownish.  Dont expect blues and greens to do well on it.  I've got a nice goncalo neck right here that has buckskin color stain applied... came out without splotches or unevenness.

 
From the Finishing Guitars with Tung Oil web article

Question
I've been finishing a guitar I made with tung oil and it's coming out good so far, except for one problem. The top of the guitar is flamed maple, so I stained with a deep brown, sanded, then applied an amber. This gave the top a tiger eye look, and it's really wonderful.

I then started putting tung oil on it. I've been putting a layer of oil on every 48 hours or so. It looks wonderful, but the parts of the stain that are dark don't dry with the same gloss as the light parts. So when you view the guitar from an edge, you can see the amber parts of the grain as glossy as can be, but the dark parts are duller. I'd really like to get the whole thing evenly finished. Preferably more towards the glossy side than the dull. So... will the whole thing even out when it does the final four week drying? Or am I not putting enough oil on yet? I've been soaking the guitar for 15-20 minutes, then wiping the oil off vigorously, then 48 hours later I steel wool it, and do it again. So far I've put on about 7 coats. I'm using pure tung oil - not the stuff with varnish in it. Any ideas/suggestions?

Forum Responses
(Finishing Forum)
From contributor D:
It sounds to me like you simply need more coats. Try wiping off the excess oil less vigorously for a few coats. This will allow a faster build of the tung oil to achieve the sheen you're looking for on the less dense, more absorbent portions of the wood. You could also try dabbing a little extra oil on those areas. I have never had to put more than about 8 coats on some very dry antique furniture. I have also never applied tung oil to maple. When I use tung oil on furniture, I sometimes (rarely) apply the first 3-4 coats in the first 48 hours without steel wool in between coats. That is only when I know the wood is extremely dry. Ultimately, how I apply subsequent coats depends on how each previous coat is absorbed. Sometimes, a finishing method must be customized to the wood from step to step, meaning repetition of the same steps over and over may not be the most efficient method. Tung oil is my favorite natural finish, but it takes a lot of time and a lot of patience and a lot of rubbing.

From the original questioner:
Thank you. I did a little reading last night, and I realized that after I was done wiping, I'd let the guitar sit for two days and not even look at it. My guess is the finish kept seeping afterwards and by the time I checked, there were shiny spots and duller spots that seeped less. So last night I blew warm air over it and sure enough, it started seeping - a lot! So I wiped all of the seepage off, and today it looks evenly sheened. Even the chatoyance is back - it had begun looking bland and lackluster.

Should I keep applying oil, or am I done? Also, can you describe your procedure for getting a good shine (gloss) off of the wood afterwards? Do you sand with fine grade paper, then polish and wax, as I've been told, or do you just keep rubbing until it shines? How long do you wait to begin the polishing process?

From contributor M:
Are you cutting your tung oil with any solvents as a carrier? I buy my tung in bulk and was told by the seller to be sure to mix some mineral spirits or paint thinner into the tung to allow it to seep in the wood deeper before polymerizing. He told me it could take several days for tung to dry on its own if it is not cut with something, and especially if the humidity is high.

From the original questioner:
No, I didn't thin it. I figured I wasn't in much of a hurry, so I just took my time. I do have a humidity problem, though. I live right on the bay. So I just bought some damp rid to cut down the humidity in the drying room. Hoping that'll speed it up a bit.

From contributor J:
I have finished a few guitars with tung oil and have had the same problem with different woods. I don't think that it's related to any of the chemicals you used to finish as much as the grain direction of the wood at the points that finish roughly. If it's like a sunburst pattern, the stain would fall on the radiused or open-pore areas of the wood near the edges of the body. It looks all fuzzy because the open end grain pores are sucking the oil in at a much more rapid rate than the flat, smooth surfaces where it's nice and glossy. I sand these areas more finely than the rest of the guitar with 320 and then steel wools. I get it hot by sanding and it kind of smears all those pores closed. I still have to apply more oil at these areas. Some woods are much worse than others.

The comments below were added after this Forum discussion was archived as a Knowledge Base article (add your comment).

Comment from contributor I:
I believe I can help you with your problem. I have been refinishing wood for years and will use nothing but tung oil. Two things I would suggest. Number one is to thin your tung oil with mineral spirits. When starting with a piece that is stripped or completely bare wood, I start with a 50/50 blend. I use that for two or three coats and do not wipe it off. I apply it evenly. Make your mixture a little more tung oil and a little less mineral spirits as you go, but I would not recommend going to a mixture that is less than 25% mineral spirits. You'll find that it is much easier to work with and keep smooth.

The second thing I would recommend is to not use steel wool between applications. It sounds like you are digging out the tung oil with the steel wool because the steel wool is not completely flat. It will dig out the tung oil in places where the wood grain is softer or slightly indented. You need your abrasive between coats to be completely flat like a piece of very fine sand paper (600 to 1000 grit, wet sandpaper) on a rubber sanding block would be.

For extreme shine like I believe you are looking for, I usually wet sand. You must make sure you allow ample drying between coats but the results are amazing. I have a solid wild cherry buffet I refinished using this method with 16 coats of hand applied and wet sanded tung oil and the finish is like a $50,000 Steinway grand piano.

Comment from contributor C:
I've found when using any oil finish that the best way to get a truly amazing finish is that when you get to the last few coats of oil apply it by rubbing it in with fine wet and dry paper. Then go through the grits from 800 to 1500 sequentially and you will come up with a really lovely sheen. Another option is to use a thinner oil like boiled linseed or teak oil for the final coats. These dry quicker and once you have applied the last coats rubbed in with wet and dry paper (cleaning off the resulting slurry which contains microscopic bits of abrasive in between each grade) polish it up with a soft cloth. You could also seal it with a bees wax finish for even more depth and longevity.
 
=CB= said:
Tru-Oil is not really an oil, but a varnish with oil in it.  

That statement is non-sensical.

Varnish is any mixture of oil, solvent, and (sometimes) resins, that dries to a hard film, the sin-qua-non of varnish is oil, without oil it would simply be an evaporative finish.

Tru -oil contains mineral spirits, modified oils, and linseed oil.  

http://www.birchwoodcasey.com/sport/msdspdfs/23035-TO8.pdf

Once the mineral spirits evaporate all you are left with is oils.  It is a varnish, but it most certainly is an oil based varnish.

http://books.google.com/books?id=JhgkpJd4vpUC&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=jeff+jewitt+varnish&source=bl&ots=EF-Sq-1LJ8&sig=2wqj1T89uPKRcNRdxB5qoL8jM30&hl=en&ei=g3IuS5yVOpGwtgeNsciLCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CCAQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=&f=false

 
Its not nonsensical at all my good man.  The part you have to pay attention to in their claim, is "modified".

Varnish is mainly a petrochem product, with petrochem resins and solvent, with (or without) oil.  If you've ever worked with commercial varnish type finish - an evaporative finish, and also worked with Tru-Oil, you'll immediately see the close similarity.

On the other hand, if you've ever worked with a real oil finish - linseed, tung, etc, and worked with Tru-Oil, you'll also note the vast differences.  Oils air catalyze, while Tru-Oil is an evaporative finish, and as such, a varnish.  The name says oil.  It has oil in it.  It can be applied like an oil (sort of), but its not a real oil finsih, nor does it end up like a real oil finish.



 
Back
Top