BigSteve22
Hero Member
- Messages
- 2,798
For anyone who missed the show, the view from my house:
Appx. 71% coverage in New York.
Appx. 71% coverage in New York.
Here it was like the sun went behind a big cloud. The breeze picked up a might, but not much else. My wife's down in Myrtle Beach with her sister, she said it was about as you described. BTW, I'm originally from Kansas. Born in Shawnee county. Dad was stationed at Forbes AFB (SAC back then).AirCap said:Here in Wichita we were 93%.... the light got very thin, and the temps dropped. I didn't use glasses, but under the trees I watched on the ground as the crescent thinned out and then grew as the wind blew the leaves. It was neat.
I know exactly what you mean. Without all the media hype, I probably wouldn't even have looked up. Here's two shots of the "BigSteve Solar Observatory":Cagey said:We supposedly got about 80% coverage in the Detroit area, but even at that it was basically a non-event. Shadows softened a little bit, but if you didn't know it was happening, you probably wouldn't have even noticed.
I actually had some high, thin cloud cover at just about the time of greatest effect. But as you noted, the sun's pretty bright!Sovereign_13 said:.......A little bit of cognitive dissonance from having "overcast/winter" levels of light with a clear sky, but just goes to show that the sun is pretty G**d*** bright.
That's actually an S-10 welding lens attached to the front of the camera in the photo. (Tried to get a "real" solar viewing filter, but they were sold out for weeks.) NASA said the minimum safe welding lens was an S-14, but by using a circular polarizer along with it, it was dark enough to not damage the sensor. Of course using that filter necessitated a little post production color correction, somehow a green sun just didn't seem right. :icon_jokercolor:Sovereign_13 said:......some of our techs were passing around their welding helmets for people to look through.