Just read through this thread and I can see both sides of the debate but I definitely side with most of you and will say there's nothing wrong with the top at all.
I can understand why, to the untrained eye, an unstained top like that could appear a little lacking in figuring when all you see is super-stained beautiful 5A tops or PRS 'ten tops' all the time and they're commonly called 'flame maple' or 'quilt maple'.
It might be a little dose of reality that those 5A tops cost a lot of money to have and there is no way of getting around that. There is an upcharge for a reason, and if you pay Warmoth, they will indeed put a top like this on a guitar.
I do also sympathise with OP, though, because if you click 'flamed maple', it's not really apparent what your piece of wood will look like if you don't use the unique choice option. I think at very least there should be an indication stating that it will be a standard flamed top, and not a premium flamed top. With that said, in the standard selection, some figurings are very uniform and apparent out of the box, and some need some naphtha to bring out the beauty. Out of the box it may look disappointing and a bit of an anticlimax, but a bit of staining work will have this one looking beautiful.
Unfortunately, guitar building is all about the sum of the parts and what you do with them, not just the raw parts you receive.
OP, try and enjoy it, or if you're that disappointed in it, get in touch with the big W, I'm sure they will take you through their processes and what you can do. If you're still not happy, I'm sure plenty of people here would love to take that beautiful piece off your hands
ccasion14: