+1 Knowing the neck weight would be nice since the density of the neck wood has a big impact on the resonance quality of the guitar!Alfang said:The weight is not given, so that to us, is an unknown.
People have asked why the body weight is listed, but not the neck weight.
The weight of a body is one indicator of what kind of tone and sustain the guitar might have, I would think the weight of the neck might give similar clues to the tone
BassmanAK said:Had a raw Wenge neck, and I absolutely hated it!!!!! Waaaayyyyy too much drag... :binkybaby:
mullyman said:A raw neck had more drag than one with a gloss finish?
MULLY
dbw said:For people with really dry hands, a glossy finish is really fast. I know a guy like this. For the rest of us sweaty-palmed apes, raw wood is the way to be!
line6man said:dbw said:For people with really dry hands, a glossy finish is really fast. I know a guy like this. For the rest of us sweaty-palmed apes, raw wood is the way to be!
I don't think a drop of sweat has ever touched any of my necks. :blob7:
Super Turbo Deluxe Custom said:No help with the weight. Your goal of 9.5 lbs is probably not doable with a Deluxe 5. I have a 9.5 pounder 4-string with Maple/RW neck, and it had to have a chambered body and Ultralite tuners. There are 2 batteries however. I couldn't imagine adding more weight to the neck, not chambering the body, adding a bigger bridge and one more tuner and have it still be as light as the one I mentioned. Maybe 10 to 12 pounds might be reasonable.