mywhitenoise
Newbie
- Messages
- 20
They kind of look like 6130 Medium Jumbo to me, but I don't trust my eyes.
But why does it even matter if it is for your guitar.
This will be for a replica of that guitar. I want it to be as true to the original build as possible, even with the awkward string spacing not matching the pickup poles.
What's the point of a replica, if it diverts from the original specs? The fine details matter.Well, I get that it is a copy/replica, but if it is just for your own use, then why do all these minor things have to matter?
I've acquired over half so far! Most of the ones that I still need were custom made, so I'll go that route for some of them. The Totoro one is easy to come by, but me being very particular, I want to make sure it's the exact size and shade
I've acquired over half so far! Most of the ones that I still need were custom made, so I'll go that route for some of them. The Totoro one is easy to come by, but me being very particular, I want to make sure it's the exact size and shade. The ones I'd like to get most right now are the owl, and the Pixies logo.
What's the point of a replica, if it diverts from the original specs? The fine details matter.
I really appreciate you doing that! I agree with others, that it looks like it had smaller frets initially, and was then refretted to 6100s.Measured it down to the pixel and came up with 6150 as the closest match using the pole piece as a known width. My 2c. Easy enough margin of error for me to be wrong
I just placed my order, and ended up going with 6150. Although I think he now uses 6100 Jumbos, for the majority of the guitar's life it looks like he was using 6150s. I went to a guitar shop today to try out some guitars with Jumbos, and I didn't really like them.Measured it down to the pixel and came up with 6150 as the closest match using the pole piece as a known width. My 2c. Easy enough margin of error for me to be wrong