Bagman67 said:None of them. What you see is what you get, and what you get is synthetic products. Graphtech Tusq or Corian. If you prefer bone, you're on your own.
Just curious why you don't like graphtech? Because I ordered one for my current project
AirCap said:>MOD EDIT<Contentious comment deleted.Please be tactful and civil at all times.>MOD EDIT<Just curious why you don't like graphtech? Because I ordered one for my current project
Yeah, pretty much this lol... Just genuinely looking for info.BigSteve22 said:Maybe I'm wrong, but my take on the question from Scobass, is that he is merely asking Ramblify why he dislikes Graphtech. Not in an attempt to condemn Ramblify's reasoning, but because Scobass has one on order, and is perhaps concerned that he may have missed something about Graphtech that would change his mind about choosing it for his project.....AirCap said:>MOD EDIT<Contentious comment deleted.Please be tactful and civil at all times.>MOD EDIT<Just curious why you don't like graphtech? Because I ordered one for my current project
Rick said:Half my guitars have graphtech nuts, and 1/3 have graphtech string saver classic saddles with the tusq insert. I like them because (for me) there's no ping after I've done some bending of the strings; they seem to glide smoothly.
Rick said:Half my guitars have graphtech nuts, and 1/3 have graphtech string saver classic saddles with the tusq insert. I like them because (for me) there's no ping after I've done some bending of the strings; they seem to glide smoothly.
scobass said:I never knew guitar nuts could be so divisive lol. I literally don't care if we disagree or if someone doesn't like them, doesn't mean we can't calmly discuss why we hold those opinions in an attempt to learn from each other. I was honestly hoping for someone to post a critique or comparison of why some other material is better, etc. Oh well :dontknow: