Orichrist, I cannot understand the hatred of all things Fender
Leo had a good line of electronics going, it is a fact his amps even to this day are some of the best in the world.
So he decides to make a solid body electric guitar, but instead of the piece of art work style such as the majority of guitar makers were making. He decided to make a modern design that was both cost effective to build, but inexpensive to repair.
His design was a total success and is the pattern that most modern electrics are made by today.
A slab body, bolt on neck, and a cavity for electronics with an access plate to get into it. (so the pickguard is a access plate doing double duty on a lot of them). So what is your problem with that?
The guy revolutionized the entire guitar manufacturing process with one product, and his second product, the Stratocaster was a huge refinement that is the standard for design and style even today.
And you seem to have a problem with the company that if it were not for the founder, guitars would be hollow body art works that cost 3 grand or more. I just cannot figure it out, Fender's success is the reason the guitar and rock and roll became so prevalent. Without the basic design he layed out, you would probably be playing a tuba today.
One thing you have to face is how most guitar companies copy his process more than they do Gibson's.
So what gives? Why the hate? It is more like a prejudice, Hate for no reason.
Inquiring minds want to know what you hate about Fender. Because if it is bolt neck slab guitars do you hate all companies that produce them?