Mmmmm cobbler

[DangerousR6]

Don't know why someone hadn't thought of this before...

 

[Updown]

Ha Ha Ha  ....  :icon_thumright: .... cleaver Dougie

I could eat that pi.... 22/7 

 

[line6man]

Ok, I'm going to hijack this into a math thread. :blob7: :blob7:

Anyone care to check if my attempt at a mathematical logic statement is truthful? I'm not big on this branch of mathematics, because it has little application to me, but it's fun from an academic perspective, so I gave it a try. Any ambiguity or errors? (The concept is that all real numbers have four nth roots with the same real part, when n is four times any positive integer.)

 

[DangerousR6]

Ok, I'm going to hijack this into a math thread. :blob7: :blob7:

Anyone care to check if my attempt at a mathematical logic statement is truthful? I'm not big on this branch of mathematics, because it has little application to me, but it's fun from an academic perspective, so I gave it a try. Any ambiguity or errors? (The concept is that all real numbers have four nth roots with the same real part, when n is four times any positive integer.)

:doh:, dude it's just pi...cut and dry.... :rock-on:

 

[line6man]

Ok, I'm going to hijack this into a math thread. :blob7: :blob7:

Anyone care to check if my attempt at a mathematical logic statement is truthful? I'm not big on this branch of mathematics, because it has little application to me, but it's fun from an academic perspective, so I gave it a try. Any ambiguity or errors? (The concept is that all real numbers have four nth roots with the same real part, when n is four times any positive integer.)

:doh:, dude it's just pi...cut and dry.... :rock-on:

I'm amazed the baker could do that. If I were to try that, my numbers would be sloppy and get burnt in the oven. :doh:

Next up, Euler's number "e" in Ecstasy pills. :icon_jokercolor:

 

[Cagey]

Ok, I'm going to hijack this into a math thread. :blob7: :blob7:

Anyone care to check if my attempt at a mathematical logic statement is truthful? I'm not big on this branch of mathematics, because it has little application to me, but it's fun from an academic perspective, so I gave it a try. Any ambiguity or errors? (The concept is that all real numbers have four nth roots with the same real part, when n is four times any positive integer.)

As usual, the answer is: 42

 

[line6man]

Ok, I'm going to hijack this into a math thread. :blob7: :blob7:

Anyone care to check if my attempt at a mathematical logic statement is truthful? I'm not big on this branch of mathematics, because it has little application to me, but it's fun from an academic perspective, so I gave it a try. Any ambiguity or errors? (The concept is that all real numbers have four nth roots with the same real part, when n is four times any positive integer.)

As usual, the answer is: 42

We'll say that:
x=42
and
n=168 (n=4(42))
Then:
y168=42 (We're also saying that z=42, though z doesn't have to equal x.)
So:
y=~1.0224973665621495699426120996878
or
y=~-1.0224973665621495699426120996878
or
y=~i1.0224973665621495699426120996878
or
y=~-i1.0224973665621495699426120996878
:icon_jokercolor: