AutoBat said:Even Les Paul didn't like the SG
well they wanted to put his name on it, when they stopped production of the Les Paul and replaced it with the SG he withdrew his Name from Gibson so they had to call it the SG. Basically he thought it was a cheap thing designed to compete with Fender, which it was. I think he needed to remove his name from Gibson again when they started watering down the Les Paul and turning out 50 gadzillion cheap models of a good guitar. It has gotten that every kid on the block owns what used to be a cheap Les Paul copy, but now they say Gibson on them and are of the quality of that imported copy made by pigmy's in lower Zambailodiagyland.AutoBat said:Even Les Paul didn't like the SG
Jusatele said:well they wanted to put his name on it, when they stopped production of the Les Paul and replaced it with the SG he withdrew his Name from Gibson so they had to call it the SG. Basically he thought it was a cheap thing designed to compete with Fender, which it was. I think he needed to remove his name from Gibson again when they started watering down the Les Paul and turning out 50 gadzillion cheap models of a good guitar. It has gotten that every kid on the block owns what used to be a cheap Les Paul copy, but now they say Gibson on them and are of the quality of that imported copy made by pigmy's in lower Zambailodiagyland.AutoBat said:Even Les Paul didn't like the SG
So now, instead of a 7 year stop in the production of the Les Paul we are stuck with Gibson ripping them selves off so bad they are losing the respect of their core clientele
sorry for the hijack..
Jusatele said:yes they did put their name on a few of the first SGs, then he made them quit it.
Like always, corporate was trying to use a cheaper body, same everything else to compete, The SG is a good guitar.
However, When needing a new good set neck guitar 7 years ago, I played quite a few LPs, and bought a PRS because it was just that much better of an axe, the fit and finish is miles better than what Gibson has sunk to.
Cletus said:But why would I want to ruin a lovely SG body with that silly 6 in line guff? I like the look of the Warmoth headstock actually.
Jusatele said:check this out
http://jazztimes.com/articles/20127-d-angelico-new-yorker
http://www.myjazzhome.com/61_NY.shtml
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7Uf8JMy_i4[/youtube]
http://www.thejazznetworkworldwide.com/video/off-the-reservation