bpmorton777
Hero Member
- Messages
- 1,651
I dont think those pickups are wax potted. SQQUUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLL :sad1:
Brian
Brian
cmalidore said:I actually don't mind the look of this (the first two in particular) - even if it does look like an acid trip with strings.... Mind you I wouldn't be getting one, for that price, I'd expect a solid wood, but whatever works. As long as somebody out there likes it enough to play it, that's what matters.
smavridis said:do you think gibson cares about what ANYONE likes?
smavridis said:do you think gibson cares about what ANYONE likes?
cmalidore said:smavridis said:do you think gibson cares about what ANYONE likes?
Haha not even remotely, but I wasn't talking for them
Though in the end it does all come down to business. If nobody buys it, it won't be out there that long. So they'll care to that extent.
smavridis said:ya and then in 30 years everyone is going to want these. have you heard of the moderne?
+1 on this. I notice Martin are using laminate necks on some of their cheaper acoustics. If this enables offcuts and previously unusable bits of quality timber to be utilised, then who am I to argue. As others have said (and as has been the case since the first guitar was made) the quality of the construction will determine whether its a good instrument or not. :glasses9:Super Turbo Deluxe Custom said:Parker and Steinberger both experimented with alternative materials in an attempt to be at the top of it when that became the standard. Even Fender's aluminum bodies were an attempt at an alternative material, though not cheaper. It seems that when building most things with wood besides houses and guitars, a laminate is a logical choice. The strength of which is usally left to how it is laminated and what it is laminated with, as well as if there are any gaps in the layers of the laminate. Technically Ibanez necks, Gecko necks, and Alembics are laminates. Any integrity issues with those? I prefer a 2 piece body more than a 1 piece for this reason. We all know that some Squiers and Foreign-made Fenders are plywood. Even with a Sunburst finish it's hard to tell. It isn't until the pickguard or control plate is removed, revealing the construction, that most peoples' opinion of the sound goes down. There's good laminates and bad laminates. Given that these SGs have what appears to be carved type top, revealed by the different colors dyed on the different layers, because the carving is symetrical, it leads me to believe that these are good, even laminate jobs with no gaps. And yes, I think Gibson is easing us into a non-solid wood made guitar. It makes sense. Aren't oil companies the biggest researchers of alternative fuels? Why not be part of the new technology that puts your old technology out of business? Any business model includes growth. Sure it's the LP Standards, Customs, and Classics that pay the bills at Gibson, but Ford brought you the Mustang, F-250, Galaxy, etc. etc. They also brought you the Pinto and Festiva. Maybe this is Gibson's Ford Festiva.
chrisg said:+1 on this. I notice Martin are using laminate necks on some of their cheaper acoustics. If this enables offcuts and previously unusable bits of quality timber to be utilised, then who am I to argue. As others have said (and as has been the case since the first guitar was made) the quality of the construction will determine whether its a good instrument or not. :glasses9:Super Turbo Deluxe Custom said:Parker and Steinberger both experimented with alternative materials in an attempt to be at the top of it when that became the standard. Even Fender's aluminum bodies were an attempt at an alternative material, though not cheaper. It seems that when building most things with wood besides houses and guitars, a laminate is a logical choice. The strength of which is usally left to how it is laminated and what it is laminated with, as well as if there are any gaps in the layers of the laminate. Technically Ibanez necks, Gecko necks, and Alembics are laminates. Any integrity issues with those? I prefer a 2 piece body more than a 1 piece for this reason. We all know that some Squiers and Foreign-made Fenders are plywood. Even with a Sunburst finish it's hard to tell. It isn't until the pickguard or control plate is removed, revealing the construction, that most peoples' opinion of the sound goes down. There's good laminates and bad laminates. Given that these SGs have what appears to be carved type top, revealed by the different colors dyed on the different layers, because the carving is symetrical, it leads me to believe that these are good, even laminate jobs with no gaps. And yes, I think Gibson is easing us into a non-solid wood made guitar. It makes sense. Aren't oil companies the biggest researchers of alternative fuels? Why not be part of the new technology that puts your old technology out of business? Any business model includes growth. Sure it's the LP Standards, Customs, and Classics that pay the bills at Gibson, but Ford brought you the Mustang, F-250, Galaxy, etc. etc. They also brought you the Pinto and Festiva. Maybe this is Gibson's Ford Festiva.
jerryjg said:if any one of you were to be given one of these, you'd all be raving about how great it is.