Hi to all Warmoth forum members. I am kinda setup freak who wishes to have the setup on his guitar to be as comfortable and playable as possible. If I could I would have the Plek machine website as a default site in my browser (but I have a Warmoth.com :icon_thumright: ). I am definitely friend of stainless steel frets. But to my question. I have read somewhere that for example SRV or Clapton have their strings setup quite high because of the better tone. Well I would understand it if it was said like they love (SRV loved) their setup like that and because it was so comfotable for them and so they could have such great tone. I don't realy think higher string action could anyhow affect quality of the tone (except the situation the strings are so low that they buzz against the frets which nearly mute them). Andy Timmons or Joe Satriani are both low action freaks and I don't think we could say they have worse tone than mr. Clapton. We can say they have different tone. Maybe not as good timing as mr. Clapton has. But not a worse tone because of their low strings action. What I like is the efficiency of the freting hand movements. Low string action helps this very much. It is said that mr. Satriani has his frets leveled down so the height of the string could be even lower and closer to the fretboard. Do you guys think this is a good idea? There is a certain risk that frets leveled this way will last much shorter time. So do you think the result is worth of more frequent refreting? Thanks