Street Avenger said:
I agree, and the idea that "hands" do a better quality job than a CNC is simply ludicrous. I get really tired of hearing about "hand-built" this and "hand-built" that. If anything, hand-built things are less consistent, and yet the price triples or quadruples.
Objective quality and consistency don't come in to it. If consistency is what you value most then count yourself lucky that so many hundreds of mass-produced, identical guitars get knocked out of factories every week.
I mean hell, if all that mattered was pre-defined precision then we'd all be playing Line 6 Variax guitars and PRS would be bankrupt.
You're not paying for the precision a builder may or may not bring. Obviously, nobody is going to be as consistent as a CNC machine. But there's a lot to be said for having a very experienced builder handling a guitar every step of the way.
I say this as someone who's own guitar collection mostly consists of CNC'd, mass produced guitars but also spends most of his time handling modern custom shop and real vintage guitars: mass production is great for getting decent-playing instruments in the hands of everybody, but they are nothing compared to the works of art the big custom shops put out and those in turn are absolutely nothing on a real 1957 Strat, a real 1960s Les Paul or a 1960s Rickenbacker. And none of those were made by a drill bit attached to a computer. I spend all day handling all manner of guitars from the lowest brand new Squier to the instruments dreams are made of and without fail the guitars made by hand by experienced luthiers are always -
always - better-sounding and better-feeling than the equivalent model churned out by machine.
That's not to say I don't value my production guitars either - hell, my main stage axes are an all-Warmoth build, a MIK Epiphone and a MIK LTD - but to write off expertly-built instruments as being worth less is just crazy.