If your intent was to keep it running as a going concern, yes. But if there's anything we can take away from the Gibson bankruptcy, there's business, and then there's business. Often acquisitions are marketed as opportunities to better serve customers, realize efficiencies based on improved distribution access, scale, blabbity blah blah; but often that's smokescreen for the financial engineers taking an organization and pumping a bunch of cash out of it. The acquisition might be financed with debt taken on by the acquiring company, and that generates fees for investment bankers; and the integration generates fees for the investment bankers; and the stock acquired secretly prior to the announcement of the acquisition is sold at a substantial profit; and the restructuring necessary to continue servicing the debt generates more income for the capitalists; and so on and so forth. I don't mean to imply that this is actually what's happening with etsy/Reverb; but it would hardly be unheard of if it were to turn out to be the case.