Leaderboard

Building a set neck guitar

Name

Junior Member
Messages
34
Would you be able to glue in a warmoth neck? I mostly play lead stuff, and when I want to use the higher frets there's nothing worse for me than bumping into a big ol' wooden rectangle. I like guitars where the neck "fades" into the body, and I was wondering if there's a way to accomplish this with a warmoth. I know I'd have to cut away at the back of the body, but this would be a build made from a body blank anyway. I do currently have access to woodworking tools.
 
I saw a write-up on another forum about a guy who did that but I tried to find the thread and was unsuccessful. So, yes, it can be done but if you're going to start from scratch, why not just build it for a set neck to start with? It would be stronger that way.
 
I don't think I'm experienced enough to do fretwork, inlays, locking nut routing, etc...
 
If you want to do a set neck, take a look at Carvin/Keissel.  They sell necks you can custom design and create an neck thru design.  You just have to add the "wings".
 
DMRACO said:
If you want to do a set neck, take a look at Carvin/Keissel.  They sell necks you can custom design and create an neck thru design.  You just have to add the "wings".
That's actually pretty cool. I hadn't even thought about the possibility of building a neck through. Thanks!
 
Trying to glue in a bolt-on neck would almost certainly end in disappointment. You'd only have a relatively small (2" x 3") lap joint at the end of a 2' lever (neck) with over 100 lbs of pull on it, whose weakness is only exceeded by butt joints. If you look at any neck/body glue-up construction in a guitar/bass application, you'll see it's always a mortise & tenon or dovetail joint to give it mechanical/structural strength and a large contact area, with the glue just acting as the fastener in place of screws/bolts.

In any event, there have been a couple/few studies done in the fairly recent times that show the bolt-on joint to be superior to the glue-up as far as sustain and articulation in guitars. The studies weren't quite as robust as one might hope for if you wanted to present a "once and for all" case, but there were sensors and hi-tech instrumentation involved and they all agreed with one another, so the evidence is reasonably good. But, they also ignored some other variables in guitar design that would have a profound effect on the results, like heel shape/length, neck profile, scale length, and contact area.

Oddly enough, those same studies found the neck-through construction to be the worst, which to me is counter-intuitive, but I didn't design or conduct the tests. I have a Les Paul-style guitar here with a neck-thru design that has tons of sustain and gives you the access to the upper frets that's tough to get with the traditional design of that instrument, so I'm a little skeptical of the claims that a neck-thru isn't the best idea.

This one isn't mine, but it's the same construction...

al3200mccoceanburstflame3.jpg

It's a Festivus miracle! A Les Paul with no risk of carpal tunnel syndrome!  :laughing7:
 
Cagey said:
Trying to glue in a bolt-on neck would almost certainly end in disappointment. You'd only have a relatively small (2" x 3") lap joint at the end of a 2' lever (neck) with over 100 lbs of pull on it, whose weakness is only exceeded by butt joints. If you look at any neck/body glue-up construction in a guitar/bass application, you'll see it's always a mortise & tenon or dovetail joint to give it mechanical/structural strength and a large contact area, with the glue just acting as the fastener in place of screws/bolts.

In any event, there have been a couple/few studies done in the fairly recent times that show the bolt-on joint to be superior to the glue-up as far as sustain and articulation in guitars. The studies weren't quite as robust as one might hope for if you wanted to present a "once and for all" case, but there were sensors and hi-tech instrumentation involved and they all agreed with one another, so the evidence is reasonably good. But, they also ignored some other variables in guitar design that would have a profound effect on the results, like heel shape/length, neck profile, scale length, and contact area.

Oddly enough, those same studies found the neck-through construction to be the worst, which to me is counter-intuitive, but I didn't design or conduct the tests. I have a Les Paul-style guitar here with a neck-thru design that has tons of sustain and gives you the access to the upper frets that's tough to get with the traditional design of that instrument, so I'm a little skeptical of the claims that a neck-thru isn't the best idea.

This one isn't mine, but it's the same construction...

al3200mccoceanburstflame3.jpg

It's a Festivus miracle! A Les Paul with no risk of carpal tunnel syndrome!  :laughing7:

I have been GASSING for an Agile neck through....
 
Fantastic instruments. $499 in the box, out the door. I did nothing to mine, and I'm pretty picky. Even the frets and action were great. That's the 3200.
 
There's several kit guitars you could try, like Precision guitar kits or Pit Bull guitar kits. But as Cagey said, trying yo glue a bolt on neck and body isn't a good idea...
 
Back
Top