...brilliant use of mismatching screw finishes for the switch on the jackplate.
I find it kinda amazing that supposedly top-notch companies like Gibson & Fender will often take out multiple full-page glossy color ads in all the guitar magazines, using the same pictures - showing a guitar with strings that fall off the edge of the fretboard, strings that entirely miss the pickup polepieces by 1/8", frets and fret ends you could use to saw teeth with.... I mean I understand that if you plop down $1,200 - $6,000 sight unseen for a Gibson or Fender at the Muziscum Fiend website you're taking your chances, but can't they make the effort to at the very least photoshop the INTERNATIONALLY-PROMOTED EXEMPLAR GUITAR so as to try to appear that they give a crap about whether it will work correctly?
(Obviously) it be would way too much trouble to pick out a guitar where the strings line up right (gee mebbe there ain't none :icon_scratch but can't they even pretend? O.K., sorry.
"Click to enlarge":
http://www.fender.com/products/search.php?partno=0100202850
Vibrato that high E, huh? :dontknow:
Whatever you might say about Paul Reed Smith guitars*, they do give great picture... the frets always look nummy. Ibanez, Washburn, Schecter and a number of other Asian-based manufacturers at least know the value of attractive pictures, and it goes right to the various company's intelligence & direction. When even your PROMOTIONAL division can't seem to give a rat's patootie about whether their guitars sell or not, imagine how enthused the wage slaves are. :sad:
*(I'd play every free one you gave me!) :hello2: