Cagey said:It would be in paries. Or, serallel. Be sorta like Schroedinger's cat - wired, but not wired :laughing7:
swarfrat said:It's a discrete either or proposition.
swarfrat said:Actually it's not impossible, well - almost. You can do it if you don't mind having a resistance loading the point between the two coils in series mode.
Note: this was purely an exercise to put off mowing the grass. It's not guaranteed to work, and I think it's a waste of time. It's also not likely to be hum cancelling at any point in between, but that may be the heat stroke talking.
mwbjr13 said:Ok thats good to know but how does this work?
http://www.music-man.com/instruments/guitars/silhouette-bass.html
Check out the diagram section and notice that a pot is used for this purpose. Or at least it appears.
Johnfv said:I rarely use tone controls so what I have done on a few guitars is convert a tone pot to a variable split for a 4 wire humbucker (a very simple mod). The variable split allows you to blend in the 2nd coil so you get a broad range from full series humbucker to fully split single coil - some of the "in between" tones are excellent. In addition, with the combined pot/dpdt switch you can do series/parallel/split with variable split on the pot. I've done a few that way also...