ejm
Junior Member
- Messages
- 25
17 September 2021
Review of Warmoth 59 Roundback neck
Received: Mid July 2021
Neck backshape: 59 Roundback
Fingerboard radius: 7.25 inch Vintage
Nut width: 1.65 inches
Fingerboard: Pau Ferro
Neck shaft: Maple
Finish ordered: None/Unfinished
Frets: 6150 (NOT 6105), spec = 0.047 x 0.104, Warmoth beveled
Tuner holes: Sperzel (staggered height tuners)
Nut: Warmoth cut and installed TUSQ XL white (note: NOT an off the shelf pre-slotted nut)
Other details:
Guitar body: Mexican Strat with tremolo
Bridge string spacing: Standard modern (approximately) 52.4 mm (2 1/16 inch) E to E. Note: this is NOT the older vintage spacing.
String gauge: 009 to 042
My review is NOT oriented towards the person with a bench full of luthier tools, nut files, above average experience, etc etc etc.
Here are my first time buyer findings.
Summary:
I guess the only two complaints are:
- You'll most likely need to install at least one string tree. Even if you're using staggered height tuners. Minor issue, but don't be surprised. I'm using a Strat, but this probably applies to Teles as well. If you don't, the strings may pop out of the nut when bending.
- The Warmoth installed TUSQ nut was the major disappointment. In short, I would not order a Warmoth installed nut again, but instead I'd do my own using a pre-slotted off the shelf Graphtech TUSQ nut.
Add it all up, and IMO this neck was NOT ready to go out of the box. The strings would pop out of the nut slots, and it would not stay in tune in spite of several things that I tried. I gave this neck a couple of months to settle in, and it was a no-go.
However, if you have an OTS TUSQ nut and string trees waiting when you receive the neck, unless I missed something, there is nothing extra or unexpected that would have been needed to be done.
Install the the tuners, string tree, bolt it on, adjust, and play. (Yes, I know about having to drill the tuner screw/guide holes, etc. This review is not about that.)
1) If you have all of the parts waiting, and the neck arrives, and you put it together, and the high E (or some other string) pops out of the nut the first time that you bend a string, now you need a string tree. If you live in a remote area with no shops, or don't have one handy, now you need to wait some more until you can get one.
2) The Warmoth installed nut that I received was (I hate to say it) not much more than a guide for the strings. I'm convinced now, after replacing the nut, and also trying several things, that the nut was the reason that the guitar would not stay in tune and/or play in tune when using the trem or bending the strings. (Of course, if playing in tune or staying in tune is not a requirement for you, then this isn't an issue.) To fix this problem you need to either:
- Replace the nut, either yourself or by taking it to a tech/luthier, or
- Have a tech/luthier rework the nut.
Both require more time and more money spent. And once again, if you live in a remote area, you may not have access to either of these things.
So, how to fix these problems?
1) String trees: Warmoth: At the minimum, put a note on your web site that you will probably need one for the E/B strings, regardless of the tuners that you end up using.
2) The nut: I could recommend several things to Warmoth to maybe fix this problem. That would cost them time and money though, and is a whole 'nuther can of worms.
However, I'll orient this solution towards the end user instead, since it is probably easier for everybody in the long run.
- Just use a pre-slotted off the shelf Graphtech TUSQ nut. You could install (glue) it in after adjusting the height. I have replaced the nuts of a few other guitars this way. It is easy and cheap. There are more than a few videos on Youtube (Stew Mac has a couple of short ones, among others). Done.
Add it all up, and IMO this neck was NOT ready to go out of the box. The strings would pop out of the nut slots, and it would not stay in tune.
So, install the string trees and an OTS nut.
Outside of installing tuners, it would then essentially be truly playable "out of the box".
Install the the tuners, OTS nut, string tree, bolt it on, adjust, and play.
No extra time and expenses with a tech/luthier.
(Unless of course you want super low action and/or are really picky, in which case you're on your own.)
It might sound like, after all of that, that I'm not happy with this neck. That is not the case at all. Other than that, I can't think of anything that I'm not pleased with.
Some other things, not criticisms, but mostly comments neither negative nor positive, that may help someone to sort things out.
- The 59 RB neck carve is not as beefy or chunky as I had hoped or thought that it would be, or at least it doesn't really feel like it. Even though it measures per the specs and might lead you to believe that it would feel chunky, it doesn't feel that way. Just guessing, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of "shoulder" (like a D shape?), and that is probably why it feels thinner. However, this is NOT any fault of Warmoth, it's merely a comment on my part. If I had it to do over, I'd probably try an SRV or a Fatback.
- Measurements all spec out fine, fits together, and seems to be of primo quality. I measured everything that I could think of with digital calipers or a 64th inch scale ruler.
- I've done no fretwork on this 7.25 radius board to date. Action is currently at 5/64 inch, all strings, at 17th fret.
- The factory fret beveling is fine. I was concerned about pulling the strings off of the fingerboard. Not an issue. However, note the bridge/string spacing noted above. If you're using a true vintage spec bridge, which is slightly wider, you'll need to check for yourself.
- Frets: Fret height, 6150 (NOT 6105): The actual frets were a little taller than the 0.047 spec from what I measured. They came in at around 0.053 on average. This is understandable and could be due to a couple of things. Not complaining, it's actually a nice surprise.
- I did a check of the fret levels and couldn't find any high spots.
- Pau Ferro: Not good or bad, just a comment on the Pau Ferro fret board.
I thought that a darker board would look better with a sunburst body.
So since I wasn't ordering a maple FB, I wanted something a little brighter sounding than the standard go to Rosewood. I went through the Warmoth tone charts for the various woods and settled on the Pau Ferro.
Even after having the strings on for over a month, and playing a lot, they still sound like new. They still have a lot of "snap". Could it be the Pau Ferro? Maybe.
I have a few other "better" guitars. But for some reason, after getting this build in line, I haven't played any of them since. After the couple of "gotchas" I mentioned, the neck and guitar really does play nice.
I would order from Warmoth again, but make a couple of changes knowing what I do now.
The end.
Review of Warmoth 59 Roundback neck
Received: Mid July 2021
Neck backshape: 59 Roundback
Fingerboard radius: 7.25 inch Vintage
Nut width: 1.65 inches
Fingerboard: Pau Ferro
Neck shaft: Maple
Finish ordered: None/Unfinished
Frets: 6150 (NOT 6105), spec = 0.047 x 0.104, Warmoth beveled
Tuner holes: Sperzel (staggered height tuners)
Nut: Warmoth cut and installed TUSQ XL white (note: NOT an off the shelf pre-slotted nut)
Other details:
Guitar body: Mexican Strat with tremolo
Bridge string spacing: Standard modern (approximately) 52.4 mm (2 1/16 inch) E to E. Note: this is NOT the older vintage spacing.
String gauge: 009 to 042
My review is NOT oriented towards the person with a bench full of luthier tools, nut files, above average experience, etc etc etc.
Here are my first time buyer findings.
Summary:
I guess the only two complaints are:
- You'll most likely need to install at least one string tree. Even if you're using staggered height tuners. Minor issue, but don't be surprised. I'm using a Strat, but this probably applies to Teles as well. If you don't, the strings may pop out of the nut when bending.
- The Warmoth installed TUSQ nut was the major disappointment. In short, I would not order a Warmoth installed nut again, but instead I'd do my own using a pre-slotted off the shelf Graphtech TUSQ nut.
Add it all up, and IMO this neck was NOT ready to go out of the box. The strings would pop out of the nut slots, and it would not stay in tune in spite of several things that I tried. I gave this neck a couple of months to settle in, and it was a no-go.
However, if you have an OTS TUSQ nut and string trees waiting when you receive the neck, unless I missed something, there is nothing extra or unexpected that would have been needed to be done.
Install the the tuners, string tree, bolt it on, adjust, and play. (Yes, I know about having to drill the tuner screw/guide holes, etc. This review is not about that.)
1) If you have all of the parts waiting, and the neck arrives, and you put it together, and the high E (or some other string) pops out of the nut the first time that you bend a string, now you need a string tree. If you live in a remote area with no shops, or don't have one handy, now you need to wait some more until you can get one.
2) The Warmoth installed nut that I received was (I hate to say it) not much more than a guide for the strings. I'm convinced now, after replacing the nut, and also trying several things, that the nut was the reason that the guitar would not stay in tune and/or play in tune when using the trem or bending the strings. (Of course, if playing in tune or staying in tune is not a requirement for you, then this isn't an issue.) To fix this problem you need to either:
- Replace the nut, either yourself or by taking it to a tech/luthier, or
- Have a tech/luthier rework the nut.
Both require more time and more money spent. And once again, if you live in a remote area, you may not have access to either of these things.
So, how to fix these problems?
1) String trees: Warmoth: At the minimum, put a note on your web site that you will probably need one for the E/B strings, regardless of the tuners that you end up using.
2) The nut: I could recommend several things to Warmoth to maybe fix this problem. That would cost them time and money though, and is a whole 'nuther can of worms.
However, I'll orient this solution towards the end user instead, since it is probably easier for everybody in the long run.
- Just use a pre-slotted off the shelf Graphtech TUSQ nut. You could install (glue) it in after adjusting the height. I have replaced the nuts of a few other guitars this way. It is easy and cheap. There are more than a few videos on Youtube (Stew Mac has a couple of short ones, among others). Done.
Add it all up, and IMO this neck was NOT ready to go out of the box. The strings would pop out of the nut slots, and it would not stay in tune.
So, install the string trees and an OTS nut.
Outside of installing tuners, it would then essentially be truly playable "out of the box".
Install the the tuners, OTS nut, string tree, bolt it on, adjust, and play.
No extra time and expenses with a tech/luthier.
(Unless of course you want super low action and/or are really picky, in which case you're on your own.)
It might sound like, after all of that, that I'm not happy with this neck. That is not the case at all. Other than that, I can't think of anything that I'm not pleased with.
Some other things, not criticisms, but mostly comments neither negative nor positive, that may help someone to sort things out.
- The 59 RB neck carve is not as beefy or chunky as I had hoped or thought that it would be, or at least it doesn't really feel like it. Even though it measures per the specs and might lead you to believe that it would feel chunky, it doesn't feel that way. Just guessing, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of "shoulder" (like a D shape?), and that is probably why it feels thinner. However, this is NOT any fault of Warmoth, it's merely a comment on my part. If I had it to do over, I'd probably try an SRV or a Fatback.
- Measurements all spec out fine, fits together, and seems to be of primo quality. I measured everything that I could think of with digital calipers or a 64th inch scale ruler.
- I've done no fretwork on this 7.25 radius board to date. Action is currently at 5/64 inch, all strings, at 17th fret.
- The factory fret beveling is fine. I was concerned about pulling the strings off of the fingerboard. Not an issue. However, note the bridge/string spacing noted above. If you're using a true vintage spec bridge, which is slightly wider, you'll need to check for yourself.
- Frets: Fret height, 6150 (NOT 6105): The actual frets were a little taller than the 0.047 spec from what I measured. They came in at around 0.053 on average. This is understandable and could be due to a couple of things. Not complaining, it's actually a nice surprise.
- I did a check of the fret levels and couldn't find any high spots.
- Pau Ferro: Not good or bad, just a comment on the Pau Ferro fret board.
I thought that a darker board would look better with a sunburst body.
So since I wasn't ordering a maple FB, I wanted something a little brighter sounding than the standard go to Rosewood. I went through the Warmoth tone charts for the various woods and settled on the Pau Ferro.
Even after having the strings on for over a month, and playing a lot, they still sound like new. They still have a lot of "snap". Could it be the Pau Ferro? Maybe.
I have a few other "better" guitars. But for some reason, after getting this build in line, I haven't played any of them since. After the couple of "gotchas" I mentioned, the neck and guitar really does play nice.
I would order from Warmoth again, but make a couple of changes knowing what I do now.
The end.