B3Guy said:Why are we still putting rear trem covers on top of the wood? why can't the trem cover be recessed so it sits flush with the body? (just sayin') Is it a Fender licensing issue?
jimh said:I left the trem cover off my strat. I think it looks cool with the springs exposed. :dontknow:
Super Turbo Deluxe Custom said:B3Guy said:Why are we still putting rear trem covers on top of the wood? why can't the trem cover be recessed so it sits flush with the body? (just sayin') Is it a Fender licensing issue?
Can't be, I have a Fender (MIJ) with a recessed trem spring cover. It may be a trem block issue for most bridges. Lowering the cover the depth of the cover could hit the springs and trem block. But as far as mounting plastic on top wood, pickguards do that. IIRC, the license pertains to the recreating the headstock shape.
Marko said:jimh said:I left the trem cover off my strat. I think it looks cool with the springs exposed. :dontknow:
not when you are used to playing the guitar naked it isn't!
jimh said:Marko said:jimh said:I left the trem cover off my strat. I think it looks cool with the springs exposed. :dontknow:
not when you are used to playing the guitar naked it isn't!
Ummmmmmm. Okaaaaay :-\
+1AutoBat said:I think it looks sloppy not to have the trem cover.
I think we share the same problem, with pubes getting stuck in the springs... It hurts when you forget to divebomb before taking the guitar off.Marko said:jimh said:I left the trem cover off my strat. I think it looks cool with the springs exposed. :dontknow:
not when you are used to playing the guitar naked it isn't!
The Norwegian Guy said:I think we share the same problem, with pubes getting stuck in the springs... It hurts when you forget to divebomb before taking the guitar off.Marko said:jimh said:I left the trem cover off my strat. I think it looks cool with the springs exposed. :dontknow:
not when you are used to playing the guitar naked it isn't!
I think it looks classy!AutoBat said:I think it looks sloppy not to have the trem cover.
After that last post... you're not allowed to talk about classy.The Norwegian Guy said:I think it looks classy!AutoBat said:I think it looks sloppy not to have the trem cover.
And with a tremol-no, it's annoying to have to remove 6 screws to be able to adjust it.
agreed. but I also think they look BEST if they are recessed.lafromla1 said:I have two Fender strats that have them on, and my two W's have them off. I wish they weren't on the Fenders, but leaving holes in the wood looks even worse, so I leave them on.
I think they look better with them off.
The Norwegian Guy said:I think we share the same problem, with pubes getting stuck in the springs... It hurts when you forget to divebomb before taking the guitar off.Marko said:jimh said:I left the trem cover off my strat. I think it looks cool with the springs exposed. :dontknow:
not when you are used to playing the guitar naked it isn't!