Hello,
I just built a strat using a Paulownia body, and maple neck. The guitar turned out amazingly lightweight, and played acoustically it is pretty much twice as loud as a very good sounding alder body 90's "vintage reissue" strat that I have. It's quite twangy on the low E too.
It would be fantastic if it wasn't for the dreadful lack of mids. It seems like mids don't even exist on that guitar, and on top of that, all across the fretboard every note seems to lack a certain "warmth" or "body" or whatever you might call it.
On a 0 to 10 scale, I'd say attack 10, volume 10, sustain 6, character 0.
What's funny is, the volume difference with the alder body guitar disappears when I plug both guitars in--and the Fender has a much more pleasing sound. I guess the perceived volume has more to do with mids than volume itself.
Some time ago I had a custom-built Telly, it was quite an experiment with a chambered (thin line-style) swamp-ash body with maple top. It was also very light, but with the same lack of character as the paulownia strat.
So, here are my questions:
- does anyone have experience with paulownia, and do you notice this lack of mids?
- are mids dependent on the weight of the body, besides the type of wood? In other words, will a heavier piece of ash have more mids than a lighter piece of ash?
Thank you in advance for your comments.
I just built a strat using a Paulownia body, and maple neck. The guitar turned out amazingly lightweight, and played acoustically it is pretty much twice as loud as a very good sounding alder body 90's "vintage reissue" strat that I have. It's quite twangy on the low E too.
It would be fantastic if it wasn't for the dreadful lack of mids. It seems like mids don't even exist on that guitar, and on top of that, all across the fretboard every note seems to lack a certain "warmth" or "body" or whatever you might call it.
On a 0 to 10 scale, I'd say attack 10, volume 10, sustain 6, character 0.
What's funny is, the volume difference with the alder body guitar disappears when I plug both guitars in--and the Fender has a much more pleasing sound. I guess the perceived volume has more to do with mids than volume itself.
Some time ago I had a custom-built Telly, it was quite an experiment with a chambered (thin line-style) swamp-ash body with maple top. It was also very light, but with the same lack of character as the paulownia strat.
So, here are my questions:
- does anyone have experience with paulownia, and do you notice this lack of mids?
- are mids dependent on the weight of the body, besides the type of wood? In other words, will a heavier piece of ash have more mids than a lighter piece of ash?
Thank you in advance for your comments.