COUGH *snake oil* COUGH.
More honestly, there may be something going on here that's worthwhile, but it's probably about the same as the Earvana thing: the value realized is minimal and unlikely to be realized or appreciated by the bulk of users. Hence the high price: To recoup costs of development and marketing a thing that won't be widely adopted, you gotta price it high enough that there's a decent margin after covering the input costs. Plus there's also that Laffer-curve thing - maybe you'd have wider adoption and thus greater gross revenues if you priced it lower, but we're just getting started here and monopolies patents are SUPPOSED to guarantee exclusive profits to the inventors or those who license from the inventors.
Meanwhile, I think a decent $30 fixed bridge and quality tuners and a well-cut nut will get 99.7% of guitarists 99.7% of what this bridge guarantees.
Carry on...
Bagman