fdesalvo
Hero Member
- Messages
- 3,609
CDbaby just released my little EP. Should be hitting iTunes and Amazon any moment now, but I'm in a pickle, gents. A pickle!
The last tracks I released (and subsequently pulled) received tons of spins via xbox, rhapsody, etc..tons of spins. If these were downloads, I could have taken a year off of work to focus on writing. Instead, these were streaming figures, which pay around $.0001 per spin. When you look at that figure and realize that by the time the spin count equals the price of a single $.99 download, the track will have entered the "stairway to heaven" burnout zone.
I'm considering offering only downloads, barring any streaming service. This would reduce my exposure at the expense of any streaming profits, which - let me not kid myself - were enough to support my bi-weekly M&M habit. Hey, I'm not complaining. The potential upshot is that people who dig the tracks would have to pay for the mp3; a dying ritual, which is probably near extinction.
Maybe this email is a "what would you do?". Maybe it's me venting and wishing that things were different, but all I know is I'm going to continue creating and releasing music regardless of the industry's landscape. I have no choice.
Have any of you had any experience with this? I feel if I continue allowing my music to stream, no downloads will materialize. I've asked many people about how they go about acquiring music and the consensus seems to be that no one owns the music they listen to. What sad times!
The last tracks I released (and subsequently pulled) received tons of spins via xbox, rhapsody, etc..tons of spins. If these were downloads, I could have taken a year off of work to focus on writing. Instead, these were streaming figures, which pay around $.0001 per spin. When you look at that figure and realize that by the time the spin count equals the price of a single $.99 download, the track will have entered the "stairway to heaven" burnout zone.
I'm considering offering only downloads, barring any streaming service. This would reduce my exposure at the expense of any streaming profits, which - let me not kid myself - were enough to support my bi-weekly M&M habit. Hey, I'm not complaining. The potential upshot is that people who dig the tracks would have to pay for the mp3; a dying ritual, which is probably near extinction.
Maybe this email is a "what would you do?". Maybe it's me venting and wishing that things were different, but all I know is I'm going to continue creating and releasing music regardless of the industry's landscape. I have no choice.
Have any of you had any experience with this? I feel if I continue allowing my music to stream, no downloads will materialize. I've asked many people about how they go about acquiring music and the consensus seems to be that no one owns the music they listen to. What sad times!