Leaderboard

Natural binding

mullyman

Hero Member
Messages
1,857
Is anyone else getting tired of the natural binding? I'll openly admit that the binding on both of my guitars was partly the reason I chose them. I really like it. But lately it seems as if every other guitar coming down the pipe in the showcase has it and it's kind of lost its appeal. What do you guys think?
MULLY
 
exaN said:
I never liked the natural binding on Strats to be honest :dontknow:

Fair enough. Everyone has their own tastes. For me, seeing natural binding on a Strat was extremely unusual so it really stuck out to me and I loved it. Now though......it's becoming normal.
MULLY
 
I still think it looks great. If you're interested in swapping one for a Fender Black '93 with minor scuffs (no not scuffs, genuine relic'd bits!!!) we can ship our bodies across the ocean.
 
Well don't get me wrong, I think natural binding is a very nice custom touch, I just don't see myself playing a Strat that has natural binding.
 
mullyman said:
exaN said:
I never liked the natural binding on Strats to be honest :dontknow:

Fair enough. Everyone has their own tastes. For me, seeing natural binding on a Strat was extremely unusual so it really stuck out to me and I loved it. Now though......it's becoming normal.
MULLY

Who cares? :icon_scratch:
 
line6man said:
mullyman said:
exaN said:
I never liked the natural binding on Strats to be honest :dontknow:

Fair enough. Everyone has their own tastes. For me, seeing natural binding on a Strat was extremely unusual so it really stuck out to me and I loved it. Now though......it's becoming normal.
MULLY

Who cares? :icon_scratch:

It's called conversation. I was just wondering if the appeal has been wearing off of anyone else. Like I said, it seems like every other body in the showcase now has it.
MULLY
 
i love my strat with natural binding. honestly the f-hole and clean looking binding are what drew me to that guitar. i could see it being a problem if somebody owned EVERY guitar in the showcase, but considering they'll be owned by many different people i think it's just a way for a couple hundred people to have something very custom.

and damn it looks good!
 
mullyman said:
line6man said:
mullyman said:
exaN said:
I never liked the natural binding on Strats to be honest :dontknow:

Fair enough. Everyone has their own tastes. For me, seeing natural binding on a Strat was extremely unusual so it really stuck out to me and I loved it. Now though......it's becoming normal.
MULLY

Who cares? :icon_scratch:

It's called conversation. I was just wondering if the appeal has been wearing off of anyone else. Like I said, it seems like every other body in the showcase now has it.
MULLY

I just don't see what the problem is.
Why would you care whether you're taste in binding options is popular or a rarity? If you like the natural binding, buy a body with it, and if you don't like natural binding, don't buy a body with it, but by all means, don't be concerned with whether everyone else is doing it or not.  :dontknow:
 
mullyman said:
Is anyone else getting tired of the natural binding? I'll openly admit that the binding on both of my guitars was partly the reason I chose them. I really like it. But lately it seems as if every other guitar coming down the pipe in the showcase has it and it's kind of lost its appeal. What do you guys think?
MULLY

I'm a big fan of the effect. I still marvel at it every time I pick up my Strat. Everyone else who sees it does the same - it's pretty unique.

We're sorta spoiled here. We look at almost nothing but absolutely gorgeous guitars nearly every day, mostly finished by the same company. It's inevitable that we'll see some repetition, certainly a great deal more than your average bear. Think about it. You hang out on this forum, you're going to see at least a dozen or more Warmoth bodies a day. In the real world, you might only see a few your whole life that you're aware of. There was a guy here the other day who'd been playing for many years who didn't recognize my Strat as a Warmoth. You'd think somebody in the business, or at least a serious hobbyist, would be acutely aware of them. But, they're not. They may know of them, but aren't exposed to them very often.

It would be interesting to know how many bodies Warmoth turns out per year versus how many guitars are sold.
 
I'm not really a fan of natural binding in the "drop top" look. Neither of my Warmoths have it. But in some cases I can see where it does look good on the right body with the right finish. For a natural binding I prefer it on the side only like below.

 
line6man said:
I just don't see what the problem is.
Why would you care whether you're taste in binding options is popular or a rarity? If you like the natural binding, buy a body with it, and if you don't like natural binding, don't buy a body with it, but by all means, don't be concerned with whether everyone else is doing it or not.  :dontknow:

I don't understand why you're being so argumentative about this. Both of my Strats have natural binding. I'm not saying I don't like it..........I guess what I'm trying to say, or ask for that matter, is if people think that lately Warmoth is overdoing it with the natural binding on the Strats. Again, I fell in love with it when I first saw it because the Strats with it were far and few between. Now it seems like the majority of them have it. It's beginning to be cliche. Like the guy in the GOTM thread that said he's not too impressed with the maple tops anymore. And again, just conversation, not trying to ruffle any feathers.
MULLY
 
I actually like it a lot on most bodies.  Warmoth finishes are simply the bee's knees.  Ku-wah-ee des neh!

-Mark
 
I don't like it that much on carved tops.  I think it looks cool on drop tops though.  For a carved top I like the classic, plastic binding.  Real wood binding would be cooler still! :)
 
Cagey said:
mullyman said:
Is anyone else getting tired of the natural binding? I'll openly admit that the binding on both of my guitars was partly the reason I chose them. I really like it. But lately it seems as if every other guitar coming down the pipe in the showcase has it and it's kind of lost its appeal. What do you guys think?
MULLY

I'm a big fan of the effect. I still marvel at it every time I pick up my Strat. Everyone else who sees it does the same - it's pretty unique.

We're sorta spoiled here. We look at almost nothing but absolutely gorgeous guitars nearly every day, mostly finished by the same company. It's inevitable that we'll see some repetition, certainly a great deal more than your average bear. Think about it. You hang out on this forum, you're going to see at least a dozen or more Warmoth bodies a day. In the real world, you might only see a few your whole life that you're aware of. There was a guy here the other day who'd been playing for many years who didn't recognize my Strat as a Warmoth. You'd think somebody in the business, or at least a serious hobbyist, would be acutely aware of them. But, they're not. They may know of them, but aren't exposed to them very often.

It would be interesting to know how many bodies Warmoth turns out per year versus how many guitars are sold.

I think this is the culprit. As you say, people are tired of flame/quilt maple aswell, because there are so many warmoths with it. But for a guitarist who hasn't been introduced to the world of custom guitars, flames/quilts are very attractive. I thought of getting a quilt with a nice red dye (my Schecter Damien Special has a similar color but with a much worse quilt) but in the end I decided I wanted a natural look and went with flame koa. However, my point is that warmoth makes fine guitars and a lot of people want their guitar to look really cool and pretty. 3-5A flamed/quilted tops aren't really common amongst your standard music-store guitar though and is a dream for many to own. I think we've grown tired of it just because WE see it oftenly, but it's far from commonplace if you take the full market into the mix.

Same goes for natural binding. If warmoth stands for 5% of all produced guitar's and 10% of their guitars have natural binding, it's not really that many guitars really.

Your guitar will still be a unique piece and not something common. Also, Warmoth is a company. Companies are out to make money and if something sells, they will produce more of it. I see this kind of thing all the time with MMO-games, something rare becomes more common and suddenly no-one wants it. Goes for titles, gear, pets, mounts w/e. I'd say, as long as you're happy with your choice and like your guitar, stick with that. If someone else has it too, think positively. If other people have it/want it, it means it looks great and that you have a guitar other people want.
 
Kaoskadosk said:
But for a guitarist who hasn't been introduced to the world of custom guitars, flames/quilts are very attractive.

i agree with this 110%. not just with quilted and flamed maple tops, but with all custom options. if i saw some of the $300-$400 bodies in the warmoth showcase on a finished guitar and somebody told me "this cost me $4000 from the fender custom shop" i wouldn't have questioned it at all. and now i myself am one of the owners of these awesome natural binding bodies.
 
Kaoskadosk said:
Cagey said:
mullyman said:
Is anyone else getting tired of the natural binding? I'll openly admit that the binding on both of my guitars was partly the reason I chose them. I really like it. But lately it seems as if every other guitar coming down the pipe in the showcase has it and it's kind of lost its appeal. What do you guys think?
MULLY

I'm a big fan of the effect. I still marvel at it every time I pick up my Strat. Everyone else who sees it does the same - it's pretty unique.

We're sorta spoiled here. We look at almost nothing but absolutely gorgeous guitars nearly every day, mostly finished by the same company. It's inevitable that we'll see some repetition, certainly a great deal more than your average bear. Think about it. You hang out on this forum, you're going to see at least a dozen or more Warmoth bodies a day. In the real world, you might only see a few your whole life that you're aware of. There was a guy here the other day who'd been playing for many years who didn't recognize my Strat as a Warmoth. You'd think somebody in the business, or at least a serious hobbyist, would be acutely aware of them. But, they're not. They may know of them, but aren't exposed to them very often.

It would be interesting to know how many bodies Warmoth turns out per year versus how many guitars are sold.

I think this is the culprit. As you say, people are tired of flame/quilt maple aswell, because there are so many warmoths with it. But for a guitarist who hasn't been introduced to the world of custom guitars, flames/quilts are very attractive. I thought of getting a quilt with a nice red dye (my Schecter Damien Special has a similar color but with a much worse quilt) but in the end I decided I wanted a natural look and went with flame koa. However, my point is that warmoth makes fine guitars and a lot of people want their guitar to look really cool and pretty. 3-5A flamed/quilted tops aren't really common amongst your standard music-store guitar though and is a dream for many to own. I think we've grown tired of it just because WE see it oftenly, but it's far from commonplace if you take the full market into the mix.

Same goes for natural binding. If warmoth stands for 5% of all produced guitar's and 10% of their guitars have natural binding, it's not really that many guitars really.

Your guitar will still be a unique piece and not something common. Also, Warmoth is a company. Companies are out to make money and if something sells, they will produce more of it. I see this kind of thing all the time with MMO-games, something rare becomes more common and suddenly no-one wants it. Goes for titles, gear, pets, mounts w/e. I'd say, as long as you're happy with your choice and like your guitar, stick with that. If someone else has it too, think positively. If other people have it/want it, it means it looks great and that you have a guitar other people want.

Very well thought out posts, from both of you. Yeah, I guess I was pretty broad with the natural binding statement. I was actually meaning on the Strat bodies. A few years ago you almost never saw Strats with natural masked binding. When I found my cherry burst body in the showcase that natural binding really set it off and I fell in love with it. Same goes for the white one in my sig. Especially the white one because that was the first time I saw a solid color with the natural binding. I fell in love with it. I don't dislike the natural binding at all. Just, like I said before, it seems like every other *Strat* body in the showcase has it now. HA!!
MULLY
 
Actually not that many have it, just the ones that are capturing your attention :)  I think the natural binding looks best with a dark color, like this one:

ps4961e.jpg


Personally, I like the "dyed binding," I think it's called, where there's some kind of burst, and the binding is dyed the light color. Like on my strat. Or like this one:

ps4890d.jpg


Sorta on the same subject, there was one that was in-stock last week, that was all white, with black binding. I usually find white guitars boring, but that one looked cool.
 
Jet-Jaguar said:
Actually not that many have it, just the ones that are capturing your attention :)   I think the natural binding looks best with a dark color, like this one:

ps4961e.jpg


Personally, I like the "dyed binding," I think it's called, where there's some kind of burst, and the binding is dyed the light color. Like on my strat. Or like this one:

ps4890d.jpg


Sorta on the same subject, there was one that was in-stock last week, that was all white, with black binding. I usually find white guitars boring, but that one looked cool.

Ah yeah, those look fantastic. Again, I'm not against the natural binding, just think Warmoth has gone "Natural Binding Happy" as of late.

As for these pics, that's the first I've seen of the dyed binding. Interesting.
MULLY
 
Back
Top