HOLD IT, HOLD IT, HOLD IT!!!!!! :binkybaby:
This is really starting to piss me off. I thought the site was above this type of stuff???
Guys and gals, I didn't post this here to start an argument. :icon_scratch:
To anybody who wants to start an argument over it, stop now. I started the thread which means I can delete it with the click of a button. But I don't want to because it is a real world comparison. And there's plenty to hear, definitely a benefit to somebody looking for a new pick-up.
If what I've said applies to you, good. if it doesn't, then thank you and enjoy.
It's probably the best comparison of current market pups I've ever seen. Used in real music, along with backing tracks, including vocals. and using four real world amps of different types and tones, from vintage Fender, to hot rodded Marshalls (two of them) and a Diezel Herbert!!! From clean, to light crunch, to all out gain. Who else has done it??? Anybody who thinks the high gain distortion sounds in those recordings sounded thin with a ratty-buzzy top end definitely needs to check their speakers. A laptop or small cheap desktop speakers will not give you good tone, get over it. Pups were only used in the bridge positions (even on the cleans), not in the neck spot. He's releasing disc of all the recordings so you can load up and jump back and forth between pups to hear the real differences in real time, not like now where you have to load one, listen, then load the 2nd one and listen while having to remember how the 1st sounded. On the fly track swapping, get it?!?!?!?
By the way, I'm no way affiliated with any of this shootout, didn't even submit a pup (although I have several I could have sent). Just to get that out of the way. Just figured everybody could benefit from my posting it here. :icon_thumright:
Carry on children.