mayfly
Epic Member
- Messages
- 8,972
Super Turbo Deluxe Custom said:Anyone ever noticed that if you pumped half a tank of 87 and half a tank of 91, you'd get 89 at a cheaper rate than if you bought just straight 89?
Now that's interesting...
Super Turbo Deluxe Custom said:Anyone ever noticed that if you pumped half a tank of 87 and half a tank of 91, you'd get 89 at a cheaper rate than if you bought just straight 89?
mayfly said:Super Turbo Deluxe Custom said:Anyone ever noticed that if you pumped half a tank of 87 and half a tank of 91, you'd get 89 at a cheaper rate than if you bought just straight 89?
Now that's interesting...
Dan025 said:OzziePete said:From an indepth discussion I had with a very knowledgeable bus mechanic at work on NYE (he actually has accreditation for aircraft engines and huge mining engines too)....I would not fuel a vehicle with anything containing ethanol UNLESS the car manufacturer's manual specifically states that that particular engine can handle ethanol to that level.
We have an E10 fuel that is cheaper at the pump available here in Australia, and folks are finding that their engines initally take to it, but it wears out all sorts of components (long term problems) within the engine fuel system if the whole engine wasn't designed for it and the engine tuned for it.
E85 'Flex' engines are made to handle the ethaol, a lot - or maybe even MOST - Australian engines are not.
My own car is a that has done over 240000 kilometres of mostly freeway travel and it loves a high octane lead free fuel (98 octane). High compression 1.6 litre engine. Wouldn't dare let E10 near it.
i hate to argue with your knowledgable friend but "made to handle" something is very vague, now i do agree that long term use may be bad for the engine and i dont recomend storage with e85 in a non flexfuel car as i have seen what ethonol race fuels can do to an engine (holds moisture) but being that misawa air base provides it to residents numbering over 12000 meaning several thousand cars that are not and never were designed for e85 are running on it full time with no ill effects aside from less than optimal milage and lower running temperatures i think most of us are fine to put e85 in our non flex fuel vehicles. there is some fear that the ethenol is corosive to fuel system components but i never saw any fuel system problems caused by it. and there may also be cold start problems but i can say misawa is very cold in the winter and i never encountered an issue, just some rough idle on cold or rainy days but a higher heat range on the sparkplugs fixed that.
also 98octane is high for gasoline. just how high is the compression on that thing? not that that matters without knowing how the cam is phased and the ignition curve. judging from the horsepower numbers i see on the internet there shouldn't be a need for 90+ octane unless these are lower speed higher efficientcy engines than seen in other countries. if austrailian engines need that kind of octane they seem like exactly the right type of engines to run on e85 which is about 105 octane.
AutoBat said:nearly all the fuel stations i ever see have 10 cent spread between fuel grades, so half low & half high would be the same as a full tank of mid
OzziePete said:Dan025 said:OzziePete said:From an indepth discussion I had with a very knowledgeable bus mechanic at work on NYE (he actually has accreditation for aircraft engines and huge mining engines too)....I would not fuel a vehicle with anything containing ethanol UNLESS the car manufacturer's manual specifically states that that particular engine can handle ethanol to that level.
We have an E10 fuel that is cheaper at the pump available here in Australia, and folks are finding that their engines initally take to it, but it wears out all sorts of components (long term problems) within the engine fuel system if the whole engine wasn't designed for it and the engine tuned for it.
E85 'Flex' engines are made to handle the ethaol, a lot - or maybe even MOST - Australian engines are not.
My own car is a that has done over 240000 kilometres of mostly freeway travel and it loves a high octane lead free fuel (98 octane). High compression 1.6 litre engine. Wouldn't dare let E10 near it.
i hate to argue with your knowledgable friend but "made to handle" something is very vague, now i do agree that long term use may be bad for the engine and i dont recomend storage with e85 in a non flexfuel car as i have seen what ethonol race fuels can do to an engine (holds moisture) but being that misawa air base provides it to residents numbering over 12000 meaning several thousand cars that are not and never were designed for e85 are running on it full time with no ill effects aside from less than optimal milage and lower running temperatures i think most of us are fine to put e85 in our non flex fuel vehicles. there is some fear that the ethenol is corosive to fuel system components but i never saw any fuel system problems caused by it. and there may also be cold start problems but i can say misawa is very cold in the winter and i never encountered an issue, just some rough idle on cold or rainy days but a higher heat range on the sparkplugs fixed that.
also 98octane is high for gasoline. just how high is the compression on that thing? not that that matters without knowing how the cam is phased and the ignition curve. judging from the horsepower numbers i see on the internet there shouldn't be a need for 90+ octane unless these are lower speed higher efficientcy engines than seen in other countries. if austrailian engines need that kind of octane they seem like exactly the right type of engines to run on e85 which is about 105 octane.
You obviously have some knowledge about engines etc. & I can't discuss this properly as I am at a disadvantage of not being able to talk technical with you.....The fuel I put into my Fiesta is called Premium 98 Octane.....the understanding is that it is 98 octane fuel. I have discussed my use of 98 fuel with both Melbourne - the guy I work with, and the guy who does the tuning etc on my car and both have said it is the better fuel for me to use because of the type of driving I do and the type of engine it is.. I gain better mileage per tankload using Premium 98 and the performance is slightly better. The guy who tunes my car says the engine is in great shape after doing 240,000 kilometres , so something must be right.
Australia has unleaded 91 Octane fuel, then a premium unleaded grade that is 95 octane, then this Premium 98 octane (also unleaded). Over the last few years we have introduced E10 which is 90% fuel and supposedly 10% ethanol. Australia has a domestic car manufacturing industry which is a bit of a dinosaur at times, and unless the likes of Holden and Ford wanna change things, they will lobby Government to stop innovations coming in like the Flex engines. Holden has an association with General Motors ( I think they are still owned by them) while Ford Australia is a part of the Ford group.
The discussion that took place on New Years Eve with Melbourne and another guy who used to do maintenance work on small prop aircraft (but decided to drive buses for a living for the less hassle) was way over my head in some aspects. But Melbourne has some a fine Harley Davidson motorbike as well as a couple of commuter bikes and the irregularities in the fuel avialable is driving him nuts. Because he is a mechanic and people know him, he does get approached by his neighbours etc about the problems they have with ther cars. He spoke of people being advised by sales people etc. that is was OK to use E10 (it's a cheaper fuel and a sales pitch I guess), only to have these people say the car was having engine problems a couple of years down the track. Thre has also been a push by the oil companies to do away with 91 Unleaded and just go with either E10 or Premium 95 as the base fuel. My car can handle Premium 85 but it doesn't have the same performance and my fuel usage is higher. If was doing commuting regularly to and from work in city traffic I would probably use Premium 95 but as I am on a freeway for the most part of my trip to and from work, the 98 is a better fuel for me.
Jusatele said:Ozzie, can you clarify something for me
is the octane rating system you guys use RON or MON, we use a RON + MON / 2 system here, and 98 sounds high to us in the USA
well there you go, we are talking apples and oranges, so the numbers will be different a bit.OzziePete said:Jusatele said:Ozzie, can you clarify something for me
is the octane rating system you guys use RON or MON, we use a RON + MON / 2 system here, and 98 sounds high to us in the USA
AFAIK Australia uses a RON rating for octane...
Jusatele said:well there you go, we are talking apples and oranges, so the numbers will be different a bit.OzziePete said:Jusatele said:Ozzie, can you clarify something for me
is the octane rating system you guys use RON or MON, we use a RON + MON / 2 system here, and 98 sounds high to us in the USA
AFAIK Australia uses a RON rating for octane...
Just trying to straiten out a few things here. we may be talking similar numbers and not know it