This whole "every single possible square millimeter of woodgrain must be on display at all times" thing is totally lost on me. I mean, maybe we should only put one pickup and no controls on these guitars too, right? After all, why buy that expensive wood if you're going to cut holes in it and put plastic or chrome pickups in there?
And really, cutting the wood to our preconceived idea of a "guitar body shape" is sacrilege too, right? You've got to show that wood, even if it means your guitar is just shaped like a plank with weird protrusions! Cutting any of it away for "comfort" is stupid. Why buy the expensive wood if you're going to cut some of it off?
Someone needs to develop a glass bridge. After all, putting it over an expensive piece of wood is insane. That's like two square inches of wood we can't see! What a waste of money!
And so on...
All I'm saying is, sometimes a bit of subtlety is nice. Nice woodgrain, fading to black at the sides, still looks nice. Just because you can't see every bit of wood that isn't a bad thing. The idea of maximizing how much wood you can see is only one way of looking at it. Another way of looking at it that you might try is "the parts of it that are visible wood look very nice". I mean, if I want a black/red/yellow burst, which will be transparent in the middle, why should I have a less nice-looking wood in that middle part?
I'm about to build an exotics Tele and I'm probably going to put the Tele Hybrid pickguard on it. AAARRGH! NOOOO! YOU CAN'T SEE SOME OF THE WOOD! You guys are all gonna call me an idiot but I'm OK with that, I've accepted it