Cagey said:I think it's just an aesthetic thing. As far as I know, the only way to improve the attachment is to install threaded inserts in the neck and use machine screws to attach it to the body. They have a finer thread, so you get a tighter joint and better sustain. Plus, you can remove and reinstall the neck repeatedly without deteriorating the holes the way wood screws will.
Incidentally, you can do that with ferrules or a neck plate, whichever you prefer.
swarfrat said:Beat me to it - I was going to say it's difficult to engrave them tiny little washers.
OzziePete said:But that had me thinking what you are saying here, there's only so many times you could remove the neck before the screw holes get worn, then you'd have to bore them out & glue in dowels to get a tighter hole working again. I think if you were planning on swapping out the neck pickup regularly you'd wanna think of improving the way the neck is secured or contemplate getting a neck without the overhang.
Cagey said:Or, you could do what you say - dump the 22nd fret and its associated fingerboard overhang. I'm not convinced it's such a necessary thing in the first place. It's impractical to play chords up there, and you can always stretch up/down from the 21st fret to hit individual notes.
Damon said:Cagey, what size and pitch screws/inserts do you use for the neck bolts?
Cagey said:
Damon said:Hopefully last question on this matter for me: With the F-twist bit, is the Forstner still needed? I can't imagine why the inserts would need a flat bottomed hole so long as the depth is correct, so I'm guessing the Forstner is just to clean up the hole and make sure it's round as opposed to elliptical like you tend to get with twist bits? Thanks.