In theory (and emg brochure...), the emg89 is a *sa+85*.
Well, I have several SA and a 89. If I split the 89....nothing to do with SA.
I wonder: full 89 is it really like at 85?
(John Suhr says that 89 is brighter that 85 (in his guitars, when customer want EMG, he recommends 85).
So, in your opinion, there're big/medium/small differences between EMG89 and EMG85?
Well, I have several SA and a 89. If I split the 89....nothing to do with SA.
I wonder: full 89 is it really like at 85?
(John Suhr says that 89 is brighter that 85 (in his guitars, when customer want EMG, he recommends 85).
So, in your opinion, there're big/medium/small differences between EMG89 and EMG85?