stankybudz said:
Alright so its ok to have noiseless pups and non noiseless on same axe?
Humbucker = noiseless = humbucker = noiseless =
ad infinitum
But, yeah, you can also mix 'n' match.
"Humbucker" was a trade name Gibson gave to Seth Lover's design back when he came up with what many call the "PAF" (Patent Applied For) pickups. It was a noiseless pickup in that it eliminated the hum that plagued all electric guitar pickups at the time.
It wasn't exactly new technology, so he probably should never have been issued the patent. All he did was apply a CMNR (Common Mode Noise Rejection) scheme to guitar pickups. The radio/TV industry had been using the scheme for many years prior to that.
The dummies should have applied for a trademark on "PAF", since it's widely used now even though it means almost nothing. It just refers to Seth's original configuration...
Which just means it has two "standard" coils mounted next to each other with reversed polarity pole pieces in coils that are wound inverse to each other and wired in series. Now, everybody who makes something like that can call it a PAF-style if they want to. Doesn't mean it'll sound like one of Seth's sloppy offerings, but kids'll buy anything if they think their heroes played with them.
Anyway, just about anything "noiseless" these days can be called a "humbucker" because they use the same scheme. The Hot Rails, for instance...
...is the same thing only the coils are much smaller and they use strips of metal instead of screws or slugs for poles. Makes it so you can fit it into a single coils mounting space. You can also use series-wired inverse-wound double coils with reversed polarity pole pieces that are stacked...
Also noiseless. Also "humbucking".
Lotsa variations exist.