fdesalvo
Hero Member
- Messages
- 3,609
I've got my new build set up with a temporary neck, so I could audition the electronics while I wait for UPS to deliver the neck. A caveat - this neck is a dual-expanding truss rod design, unlike the single rod setup on my main Tele, which houses the Abraxas and 63 Veneer pickups that I'm so fond of. These necks tend to impart a more immediate and sterile attack with the benefit of amazing stability. There's a trade-off to be had for sure. On that note -
The standard against which I judge all other pickups in this configuration is the Abraxas Bridge + 63 Neck. It gives me everything I ever wanted from vintage Strat tones to fat, rich, and slightly compressed humbucker tones that split extremely well. These two cover a hugely broad spectrum of tones with absolute zeal.
Crawler, Bridge
Compared to the Abraxas, the Crawler is much more compressed and rich. If you have ever played a Tone Zone, this is the impression I got without the negative characteristics (nasal, sterile, overwound, and lifeless tone). All frequencies are represented here in spades and it is larger than life. There is definitely more horsepower under the hood here. It's just huge sounding.
Low notes are very chewy and that characteristic growl that I've heard mentioned is present and quite pleasing. High notes have a scorching/burning tone that sustains into feedback and you can go well into the 22nd fret without fear of your notes thinning out. There's something about the upper mids that this pickup produces that distinguishes itself from the Abraxas' creaminess. It's more textured. More powdery and modern. This pickup can handle modern metal.
Split, the active coil doesn't give up much volume - if any. You can continue palm muting on this configuration without a huge loss in compression. What you gain is a sharper attack and string separation. This is a lovely tone. Compared to the Abraxas, which gives up a more twangy and sparkling split tone, I find the Crawler's split tone to be more modern here, as well. Both clean up extremely well with the volume pot, by the way.
All in all, I'd say the Crawler is well placed among BK's Contemporary offerings. I find the Abraxas to be more organic and subtle, and for me, more of an obvious "wow" than I received from the Crawler, but understand that I have the pickup placed fairly close to the strings and I haven't played with the height. As it stands now, I can see the Abraxas' underpinnings clearly and can appreciate the additional push of the Crawler. Where the Abraxas inspired fingerpicked, low gain passages and soaring high notes, I can see the Crawler beckoning me to goose the throttle a bit and go back to my days of silky legatos and partially muted scale runs. This is going to be a fun ride!
Mother's Milk, Neck
The tone chart indicates a brighter tone to be had with the Mother's Milks and I think that's what I noticed, but I don't want to be too hasty in my assessment here. I guess I can take some liberties, however, as I did forewarn that this review is a first impression.
Alright - now, what I love about the 63 is this: it is so amazingly organic, deep, rich, velvety, throaty, sparkly, woody, and dynamic. All of these descriptives live in the 63, even across a fairly broad height window. How can I possibly expect any other pickup to touch this expectation? Even the Apache fell a bit short, with it's struggle to cope with what I'd describe as fairly moderate gain for Texas Blues/Hendrix tones.
The Mother's Milk is as described. I believe I'm going to have to play with the height a bit. In my opinion, it comes across a bit more modern compared to the 63, though it is not too dissimilar. In fact, I'd say the differences are probably a bit insignificant, as one could say about the comparison between the 63 and Apache. For some of you, who have been blessed with less sensitive hearing, you may not notice a difference. For the rest of us, it could be enough to turn you off.
The MM ate up all the gain I could dish up. Where I found the 63 bouncy under low gain, the MM feels a little stiff - this could be the neck composition itself, so keep this in mind. The tone, however is very nice, but bordering on modern. Paired with the split Crawler, the clean tone's midrange bottoms out, as expected, but falls short of what I want and get from the 63/Abraxas combo.
What does all of this even mean? I'm not saying I'm disappointed that these two don't sound like the benchmark pair, but maybe I'm saying that's where I am now. I think I've found my sound in the Abraxas and 63 combo and I'm comfortable with this. I'm going to play the MM/Crawler combo for a while and will tweak heights once the neck arrives. I can see potential in this pairing, but for me it may come at the expense of some minor tweaking. And to be honest, I did tune my amp's preamp and power amp to suit the Tele..Looking forward to seeing what this pairing brings forth.
Here's the guitar with the temp Strat neck
Update:
Wow, what a difference height makes. I lowered both substantially and the feel I appreciated from the 63 and Abraxas appeared. In addition, the MM lost it's harsh edge and the true beauty of this pickup revealed itself. It's not quite as round as the 63 Veneer is, but it's definitely not thin or brittle. It's a nice and glassy tone that can totally cop the bubbly Hendrix vibe. It's just an outstanding pickup under light to moderate drive, as well. This is a very polished sounding pickup. In my opinion, the tone nails the 80s Strat tone. If this is likened to a 60s pickup, it would be the unaged tone.
While I prefer the split tone of the Abraxas a touch more due to the more vintage sparkle in the active coil, there's no love lost with the Crawler and the additional push really makes for one absolutely smoking lead tone. It can totally crush in the rhythm dept, as well. Like it's older brother, the Abraxas, it will do everything you ask of it, but with a it more attitude.
Before the heigh adjustments, I planned on ordering another 63 to drop into the neck. This pair has found a permanent home as far as I'm concerned.
The standard against which I judge all other pickups in this configuration is the Abraxas Bridge + 63 Neck. It gives me everything I ever wanted from vintage Strat tones to fat, rich, and slightly compressed humbucker tones that split extremely well. These two cover a hugely broad spectrum of tones with absolute zeal.
Crawler, Bridge
Compared to the Abraxas, the Crawler is much more compressed and rich. If you have ever played a Tone Zone, this is the impression I got without the negative characteristics (nasal, sterile, overwound, and lifeless tone). All frequencies are represented here in spades and it is larger than life. There is definitely more horsepower under the hood here. It's just huge sounding.
Low notes are very chewy and that characteristic growl that I've heard mentioned is present and quite pleasing. High notes have a scorching/burning tone that sustains into feedback and you can go well into the 22nd fret without fear of your notes thinning out. There's something about the upper mids that this pickup produces that distinguishes itself from the Abraxas' creaminess. It's more textured. More powdery and modern. This pickup can handle modern metal.
Split, the active coil doesn't give up much volume - if any. You can continue palm muting on this configuration without a huge loss in compression. What you gain is a sharper attack and string separation. This is a lovely tone. Compared to the Abraxas, which gives up a more twangy and sparkling split tone, I find the Crawler's split tone to be more modern here, as well. Both clean up extremely well with the volume pot, by the way.
All in all, I'd say the Crawler is well placed among BK's Contemporary offerings. I find the Abraxas to be more organic and subtle, and for me, more of an obvious "wow" than I received from the Crawler, but understand that I have the pickup placed fairly close to the strings and I haven't played with the height. As it stands now, I can see the Abraxas' underpinnings clearly and can appreciate the additional push of the Crawler. Where the Abraxas inspired fingerpicked, low gain passages and soaring high notes, I can see the Crawler beckoning me to goose the throttle a bit and go back to my days of silky legatos and partially muted scale runs. This is going to be a fun ride!
Mother's Milk, Neck
The tone chart indicates a brighter tone to be had with the Mother's Milks and I think that's what I noticed, but I don't want to be too hasty in my assessment here. I guess I can take some liberties, however, as I did forewarn that this review is a first impression.
Alright - now, what I love about the 63 is this: it is so amazingly organic, deep, rich, velvety, throaty, sparkly, woody, and dynamic. All of these descriptives live in the 63, even across a fairly broad height window. How can I possibly expect any other pickup to touch this expectation? Even the Apache fell a bit short, with it's struggle to cope with what I'd describe as fairly moderate gain for Texas Blues/Hendrix tones.
The Mother's Milk is as described. I believe I'm going to have to play with the height a bit. In my opinion, it comes across a bit more modern compared to the 63, though it is not too dissimilar. In fact, I'd say the differences are probably a bit insignificant, as one could say about the comparison between the 63 and Apache. For some of you, who have been blessed with less sensitive hearing, you may not notice a difference. For the rest of us, it could be enough to turn you off.
The MM ate up all the gain I could dish up. Where I found the 63 bouncy under low gain, the MM feels a little stiff - this could be the neck composition itself, so keep this in mind. The tone, however is very nice, but bordering on modern. Paired with the split Crawler, the clean tone's midrange bottoms out, as expected, but falls short of what I want and get from the 63/Abraxas combo.
What does all of this even mean? I'm not saying I'm disappointed that these two don't sound like the benchmark pair, but maybe I'm saying that's where I am now. I think I've found my sound in the Abraxas and 63 combo and I'm comfortable with this. I'm going to play the MM/Crawler combo for a while and will tweak heights once the neck arrives. I can see potential in this pairing, but for me it may come at the expense of some minor tweaking. And to be honest, I did tune my amp's preamp and power amp to suit the Tele..Looking forward to seeing what this pairing brings forth.
Here's the guitar with the temp Strat neck
Update:
Wow, what a difference height makes. I lowered both substantially and the feel I appreciated from the 63 and Abraxas appeared. In addition, the MM lost it's harsh edge and the true beauty of this pickup revealed itself. It's not quite as round as the 63 Veneer is, but it's definitely not thin or brittle. It's a nice and glassy tone that can totally cop the bubbly Hendrix vibe. It's just an outstanding pickup under light to moderate drive, as well. This is a very polished sounding pickup. In my opinion, the tone nails the 80s Strat tone. If this is likened to a 60s pickup, it would be the unaged tone.
While I prefer the split tone of the Abraxas a touch more due to the more vintage sparkle in the active coil, there's no love lost with the Crawler and the additional push really makes for one absolutely smoking lead tone. It can totally crush in the rhythm dept, as well. Like it's older brother, the Abraxas, it will do everything you ask of it, but with a it more attitude.
Before the heigh adjustments, I planned on ordering another 63 to drop into the neck. This pair has found a permanent home as far as I'm concerned.
