adrianb said:Thanks for the advice everyone.
I had to do a double take when i read "damp cloth."Really? Won't this seep into the wood eventually? Especially in areas where the satin has worn down to a really dull gloss? (Remind me to never again get satin nitro on a neck.)
Sadie-f said:What matters here is the duration of contact, nitro will let more moisture through than poly, however it's still a tiny amount, compared to bare wood. An acoustic will change moisture content daily, because the interior is bare, unfinished wood. And while good acoustics have an extremely thin nitro finish, a damp cloth is still a correct way to clean them.
I'm curious that you don't like satin nitro, my Martin neck is satin nitro and where my hand contacts the back most , it has approached a gloss finish which I'm completely fine with. I think the original satin was somewhat nicer in terms of lower friction, but it's not a big difference.
Sadie-f said:Let me dispel that concern, the purpose of roasting is to make the wood more stable, however I don't think I materially affects the moisture-bearing capacity of the wood. Of course roasting will temporarily remove most of the water, however, in time, that will come back to equilibrium with the guitar's environment. That's true whatever the finish is, albeit it will be slower with a heavy coat of poly vs a thin coat of nitro.
You really don't want the alternative, all finishes are fundamentally polymers, and polymers absorb solvents quite readily. Those solvents may not damage a finish, but they will definitely become part of it for a long time. Nitrocellulose however is quite likely to be damaged by any solvents coming in contact.
I've never heard that warmoth lays down a thin nitro finish. Mostly, I've heard the opposite! If you wanted to match a squier, it was more likely done in satin poly. I don't know if W offers poly in satin.
Sadie-f said:Let me dispel that concern, the purpose of roasting is to make the wood more stable, however I don't think I materially affects the moisture-bearing capacity of the wood. Of course roasting will temporarily remove most of the water, however, in time, that will come back to equilibrium with the guitar's environment. That's true whatever the finish is, albeit it will be slower with a heavy coat of poly vs a thin coat of nitro.
Sadie-f said:Sealing the pores in the sense of covering them so that e.g. they don't fill with dirt and skin oils would be more my idea of the main purpose of finishes, along with preventing direct contact from damaging the wood fibers. On a guitar without a pick guard, once the finish has worn through, the wood will show damage pretty quickly. Of course, that's a lot more pronounced in a relatively soft wood like spruce than in an electric guitar with a harder body.
All materials hold some water. I work with stainless steel ultra high vacuum enclosures, the steel holds a lot of water, we bake that equipment at up to 650 deg F to accelerate driving the water (and also hydrogen) out of the steel.
Next, yes, the finish slows moisture, and it does slow it a lot. However, the water content of the wood will change as the humidity does, so yes,.that's both in and out.
I'm sure your Ibanez is fine, glad it wasn't an expensive acoustic ;-). The satin part of the finish may be thin, may Martin neck polished up due to playing within a year, the areas I don't hit as much are still satin.
stratamania said:The Ibanez linked has a Jatoba board which is a rosewood alternative rather than a rosewood itself. Cleaning would be similar to rosewood.
From the page linked there is a link to manuals, here is the maintenance manual with the info you need.
http://www.hoshinogakki.co.jp/pdf/ibanez/manual/en/eg/maintenance_en.pdf