Sadie-f
Senior Member
- Messages
- 427
I'm asking mostly because if I ask the right folks, I can probably in time get some *hayuge* sections of beech burl.
There's not a lot of info out there about using it, one thing of note is it's got one of the highest shrinkage rates of available woods, and also a higher than most ratio of tangential:radial shrinkage. On the other hand, it's not hugely more than maple. The really low shrinkage hardwoods are, of course the ones best known for acoustic tonewoods, rosewood and mahogany.
Since electric axes change dimension so much more slowly than their acoustic sisters, the higher shrinkage rate of say rock maple clearly works fine ~ 4.8, 9.3 vs the far lower numbers for mahogany ~ 2.5, 4.5.
So I'm thinking the high rate for beech ~ 5.5, 11.9 is probably not going to keep a guitar body from working well. except for being easier to work with, it seems like it would be close to maple for tone properties.
Thoughts?
There's not a lot of info out there about using it, one thing of note is it's got one of the highest shrinkage rates of available woods, and also a higher than most ratio of tangential:radial shrinkage. On the other hand, it's not hugely more than maple. The really low shrinkage hardwoods are, of course the ones best known for acoustic tonewoods, rosewood and mahogany.
Since electric axes change dimension so much more slowly than their acoustic sisters, the higher shrinkage rate of say rock maple clearly works fine ~ 4.8, 9.3 vs the far lower numbers for mahogany ~ 2.5, 4.5.
So I'm thinking the high rate for beech ~ 5.5, 11.9 is probably not going to keep a guitar body from working well. except for being easier to work with, it seems like it would be close to maple for tone properties.
Thoughts?