DiMitriR33 said:
people who think they are smart because they have an education realy piss me off!!!
the fact is that the experts have tested it and found that it does reduce capacitence. not that that really matters much when a guitar cable has more than any pickup out there, never mind the cap in the tone control. but there is a diference, small and incremental but still a diference. and if you make enough incremental changes to something you'll eventually notice it.
theories are great but unless you can sit there with the proper test equipment and prove that there isn't a diference you can't say it doesn't hold water. if you don't like the explaination i chalenge you to find a better one.
seymour duncan test all sorts of things to find what effects the sound of a pickup. inductence, capacitence, Q, dc resistence, magnetic properties that i know little about, even the dielectric properties of diferent bobin materials. if he says it reduces capacitence i'll beleive the guy with the test equipment and years of research. he knows of Q and of inductence but has determined that the capacitence makes the diference in a scatter wound pickup.
and now to actually trump you, a hb has a good 8.5k dc resistence correct? if you place an 8.5k resistor across a 150 pico farrad capacitor (typical winding capacitence as it does exist and if it exists it can be changed) does it not now have capacitence?
now they aren't isolated they're conected right? so what's the diference?
remember the capacitence isn't necicerily only to an ajacent wire on the same layer with only an ohm or so between them. it can be between layers with 100 ohmsbetween them, it can be from the start layer to the finish layer with a few thousand ohms between.
Dimitri -
I don't really care if you're upset, though some of you clearly have pet theories of your own that are so sacrosanct to you that you bristle at and attack anyone daring to have a contrary opinion...
However the laws of physics and E&M are what they are and they are some of the most thoroughly tested and verified "theories" in the history of the known universe.
And to reiterate, if a singular piece of metal could have a capacitance relative to itself then the universe as we know it simply could not exist. Again, if that pisses you off that's on you, but I'd challenge any of you who disagree to go study and run all the tests you want. I've already done that, and don't feel a need to do all that over again in order to "prove" something to someone else.
The electric field is identically zero inside metal, if it were not then metal would not be a conductor and our universe could not exist. But it is and does and that's just the way it is. And because the electric field is zero inside metal, there's no way for it to have a capacitance relative to itself.
As to the "trump you" thought experiment, adding a capacitor across the coil does not give it a capacitance, all it does is the coil shorts out the capacitor. At DC the result is that the combination has zero capacitance (as does the coil at any freq, zero=DC on up...)
The combination IS a resonant circult and will display a complex, frequency-dependent reactive behavior... However not because the coil has capacitance, but because you've added capacitance and created a multiple-element circuit.
However and in the end, as Mr Fany (Farny, excuse me I can't quite read the small print at times) and others have pointed out in their own ways, for all their simplicity a guitar pup is a very complex elecro-mechanical device, and notwithstanding the alledged (spelling?) miniscule capacitance the coil has to itself, there are so many variables involved that experience and experimentation are the best way to arrive at good designs.
Having worked on complex Cray-based mag-field models for both exotic high-powered water-cooled electromagnets AND even more exotic, ultra-pure rare-earth permanent magnetics in exotic configurations, that much I can say...