Leaderboard

$4600 Lester,..... Really,..... ???

Death by Uberschall

Master Member
Messages
4,162
WTF,.... lets splatter (poorly I might Add) diluted black paint on a red body and charge 'em out the ass for it!!!  :doh:

http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/HB538C?utm_source=CSE&utm_medium=PPC&utm_campaign=none&utm_term=HB538C&zmap=HB538C&zmac=9&zmas=1&zmam=89202644&SID=-1

CS203161-body-large.jpg
CS203161-backbody-large.jpg

CS203161-front-large.jpg
CS203161-back-large.jpg
 
Hey!  It has gold plated hardware.  That's gotta be worth $3K just for that.
 
It doesn't make much sense to have a paint-splattered body with pristine binding. The headstock looks out of place, as well. It should be red like the rest of the guitar.
 
Ugh.  That reinforces everything I've come to think about Gibson: obscenely overpriced in general, but willing to make a rather ugly (albeit unique) finish and somehow charge a premium for it.

Also reinforces the notion of Gold hardware NOT being complimentary to most guitars.
 
Death by Uberschall said:
WTF,.... lets splatter (poorly I might Add) diluted black paint on a red body and charge 'em out the ass for it!!!  :doh:

http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/HB538C?utm_source=CSE&utm_medium=PPC&utm_campaign=none&utm_term=HB538C&zmap=HB538C&zmac=9&zmas=1&zmam=89202644&SID=-1

CS203161-body-large.jpg
CS203161-backbody-large.jpg

CS203161-front-large.jpg
CS203161-back-large.jpg
It has a special tag on the toggle switch cover...That's worth at least 2G's.... :doh:

As they say on sunday night footbal...
th
 
The amount of hubris and ego that Gibson exhibits is both appalling and astounding.
 
:doh:  What a joke ...... Metallic Red Swirl
Funny looking swirl, if ya ask me.

Needs Red Inlays  :icon_biggrin:

That finish, looks more like the end of a rattle can, when it starts to spit.
.... Apprentice at work  :laughing7: 

If I was gunna spend that much $$$$$ on one guitar, I'd spend it on 3 Warmoths thanks.  :headbang:
Because I know the finish would be a million times better.

See Gibson has bought from Roland, Cakewalk / Sonar  ....... oh dear.
 
Updown said:
See Gibson has bought from Roland, Cakewalk / Sonar  ....... oh dear.

Well, not quite yet. They've just issued a letter of intent. Nothing legally binding, per se. A letter of intent is a formal precessionary that more or less delineates an action to be taken should both parties come to agreement on terms. Usually, it means things are a done deal, though.

When you can sell anything for as much as they do, you generally end up with more money than you can realistically write off, so you have to spend it on something tax deductible lest the gummint takes the largest portion of it away to fund Obamaphones, "aid" to countries you've never heard of, enforcement of regulations nobody cares about, and such.

I worked for a company about 100 years ago where that happened. Some other company managed to get a patent on a process that they decided not to sell, but rather lease rights to use, sorta like Xerox and IBM did for a long time. They got filthy rich, and couldn't spend the money fast enough to keep it away from the gummint. So, they bought us, amongst others, and since they had no idea how our business worked, damn near ruined it.

On the plus side, since our company ended up nearly worthless as a result, a group of employees were able to buy it for a song. It has since taken over that entire market. Unfortunately, I got out about halfway through that whole debacle, so I didn't get to buy in. Would've been sweet.
 
I remember an article with Henry J. in one of the financial papers many years ago (I think it might have been the Wall Street Journal). He basically said he sold more LP's when he raised prices. Luxury goods don't operate according to the same logic (if any logic at all), and I would definitely classify +$4000 electric guitars as luxury goods. Don't blame Gibson - blame the type of people who think they're special because they pay more for something. In fact people who buy luxury goods often regard discounting something as insulting.  :dontknow:



Updown said:
See Gibson has bought from Roland, Cakewalk / Sonar  ....... oh dear.

From the looks of things Cakewalk will be better off under Gibson, if for no other reason than because of Roland's current troubles.
 
True enough. Look at Rolex watches, Rolls-Royce cars or "designer" clothing. Nothing really special about them other than the price, which makes them exclusive to those with more money than brains.
 
This or the three Warmoths that I've got planned... Tough choice that.
:doh:

My feeling on my guitars is that, while they are nice, and look good, ultimately they are just tools. I can justify $1500 or so for a really nice guitar that I will play until it falls to pieces, but looking at $4600?? For something that I know I can build for about 1/3 of that?? I just can't even get my brain around it.

It's got to be this:
drewfx said:
.... Luxury goods don't operate according to the same logic (if any logic at all), and I would definitely classify +$4000 electric guitars as luxury goods.  ....

And that's where I, and my wallet, get off the train.
 
To me, the highlighted Gibson from  Sweetwater looks like a Custom Shop version of a Les Paul Studio!

Personally I have my eye on some CS Gibsons that I do get GAS over...... I'm not ashamed to admit that. A Peter Frampton LP Custom, maybe a Lucille in red. Would be happy to shop around & try & find one for a decent price. But I know there wouldn't be much change from US$4000 & only when the time is right for me to spend that sort of money. They look classy & they have the quality evident.

But $4k on something that looks like a Studio?  :doh:
 
Back
Top