kind of an abstract question here. somewhat obvious also somewhat elusive to me. Why is it that expensive guitars seem to have such perfect squareness to the entire setup and more tendency to sound in tune in 1st or open position than cheaper ones? I picked up a cheapo guitar the other day that was made for youngsters....forget the brand...it was like a mini les paul bolt-on with an angled pocket and a nice wraparound bridge. Rather perfect design for a cheap guitar...nothing visibly out of wack at all I was reminded of my beginner days before investing in a good guitar, of when no matter how much you would tune a gutiar it would just never sound good in open position. (this was also the case with an awesome Ibanez JS 6000 of mine!) However, with Gibsons for example, even at their lowest end ...melody makers / etc ...they seem to have a reliable tendency to have the nice "squareness" or perfectness / professional feel to their set up that doesn't make me afraid of first position chords. The earvana and Buzz Feiten systems are really appealing to me as far as building goes since intonation is a primary concern of mine. But every Les Paul i have owned has not had compensated tuning and some how has that greatness about it that just sounds in tune all the time. even sounds ok when a little bit out!! Could quality pickups properly balanced also have something to do with this or is what i perceive to be more exacting luthery / measuring closer ...a reality? Same goes for fine acoustics / martins / gibsons / etc. Curious if some of the most badass Warmoth-ers can share secrets.