Leaderboard

Is it me or....

I ♥ the '59 Roundback profile.  I prefer a heavy guitar, so take that as you will.
 
AdmiralKracken said:
I like mine. It's nice to have something to grab on to instead of a toothpick neck.
Must be to compensate for shortcomings for something else...... :toothy12:


Thin necks RULE!!!!!
 
AdmiralKracken said:
Do fatback necks feel like they weigh a ton? I have a Goncalo Alves/ Pau Ferro neck and it's.... well fat.  :icon_biggrin:

Different species of wood have different densities. I don't have a Goncalo Alves neck yet, but I do have an Ebony over Pau Ferro neck in "standard thin" that's surprisingly heavy, at least to me. More than I expected, anyway.
 
I like the idea of a fuller neck profile, but ... I do wonder about getting it in wenge.
 
Exotic woods are often heavier than maple or certainly mahogany. I also have an ebony on pau ferro boatneck, and it was paired with a hollow tele body. Much neck dive resulted.

Now the neck is on a solid tele body. It's still heavy, but not as bad as the other one.

 
A maple fatback is fine weight wise. Even some of the slimmer shapes feel heavy with some exotic woods. I love fatback, it's the only thing that feels natural to me anymore and the tone rules.
 
Bet you boat neck guys would like this shape.... :dontknow:
6a00e39826b28988330133ed64a896970b-800wi
 
Standard Thin is as thick as I'd ever wanna go.  I'd actually prefer .780" to .850", but Warmoth doesn't offer that.
 
Mine definitely seems weighty, but I haven't compared weight to my standard thin neck. And now that they're both mounted on guitars I don't think I'll be weighing them. Guitar still balances just fine though!
 
I just built a wenge trapezoidal profile neck and it's the most comfortable neck I've ever held before.  It feels MUCH thinner than it actually is.
 
I loved the wizard neck on my Ibanez, unfortunately they don't offer it on the mahogany neck I want. Standard thin still feels pretty decent with my smaller hands. Now I just need to teach my fingers yoga so I can make all those chord shapes.  :sad:
 
actually, I prefer standard thin
I do consider myself a rhythm player, quite proud to be part of the rhythm section, when I have 3 fingers gripping a chord and the forth moving adding 9ths or 11ths, or playing a moving line over the chord I do not want a fat neck.
My one guitar with a fat neck I o pull out when I am going solo or the lead player and myself are going do a call and return style song, I find it easier to be fast on thicker necks.
 
That's ironic since thick small radius necks are more associated with chording and thinner flatter necks evolved with flashy soloing.
 
thats is what works for me. Standard thin works great for working inversions down the neck as I walk off a chord. But then that is me., I also find I can work my pinky or index finger for voicings within the change easier that way. With fatter necks I am forced to crank the hand out infront of the neck more not having the angle to use 1 finger on multiple strings. such as having to fret a string and mute the string above and below it
 
Back
Top